Greengoblin
1731 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
It's going to be a new improved sequel with Edward Norton as Dr. Banner and Hulk, yes this time there will be more action.
Here's the teaser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjjDGLTz8yc
And yes, the Hulk will be more realistic looking this time and won't grow in many sizes.
Here's the teaser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjjDGLTz8yc
And yes, the Hulk will be more realistic looking this time and won't grow in many sizes.
I"m very exited...
Hulk is the strongest there is ..... :)
Delete Confirmation
I"m very exited...
Hulk is the strongest there is ..... :)
I'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
Delete Confirmation
I'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
This crap better be an upgrade from that last pile of garbage that was as exciting as taking a damn mid-term.
Edward Norton is awesome in Fight Club. Is that supposed to be Abomination in the trailer?
System
79987 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Yes it is. With Tim Roth playing him!
RetroToon
I'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
Nothing wrong with the old Hulk design ...but t be honest the "old" Hulk looked too much rough around the edges ....just like the Hulk from the 70"s ...
The NEW Hulk is more cut up and has a nicer body imo :)
Delete Confirmation
RetroToon
I'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
Nothing wrong with the old Hulk design ...but t be honest the "old" Hulk looked too much rough around the edges ....just like the Hulk from the 70"s ...
The NEW Hulk is more cut up and has a nicer body imo :)
CHANCE_SUNDANCE
RetroToonI'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
Nothing wrong with the old Hulk design ...but t be honest the "old" Hulk looked too much rough around the edges ....just like the Hulk from the 70"s ...
The NEW Hulk is more cut up and has a nicer body imo :)
I think on the Hulk DVD, ILM (Industrial Light & Magic) said that the Hulk was their biggest technical achievement ever at that point cause of having to create a realistic human-like character, but since the movie came out after Shrek I couldn't help but be reminded of that green CGI ogre every time I looked at that version of Hulk. :lol:
Delete Confirmation
CHANCE_SUNDANCE
RetroToonI'm very glad that they're doing the Hulk over again. :) The 2003 Hulk could have been good but every time I watched it it turned into a snoozefest because it was so boring and slow-paced (in fact when this comes out on DVD I'm considering replacing my first Hulk movie with this one). My only problem so far is the new guy playing Bruce. I don't know, I just think that Eric Bana's voice sounded better.
And just for the heck of it, does anyone still like the old Hulk design or the new one?
Nothing wrong with the old Hulk design ...but t be honest the "old" Hulk looked too much rough around the edges ....just like the Hulk from the 70"s ...
The NEW Hulk is more cut up and has a nicer body imo :)
I think on the Hulk DVD, ILM (Industrial Light & Magic) said that the Hulk was their biggest technical achievement ever at that point cause of having to create a realistic human-like character, but since the movie came out after Shrek I couldn't help but be reminded of that green CGI ogre every time I looked at that version of Hulk. :lol:
Greengoblin
1731 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Do you think this will be a "Wrath of Khan"-esque sequel? remember how Star Trek fans thought the first ST movie sucked then the filmmakers improved it with a new and improved sequel? that's exactally whet they are doing.
System
79987 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Is it a sequel? Looks more like a remake!
I'm looking forward to watching the new version.
I liked the look of Ang Lee's version and think Eric Bana is perfect but the movie was trying to make a statement which could've been told and figured out within the first 20 minutes. The beginning of the film was so well done and started the movie well too.
Plus this is Hulk, I wanted to see ''Me Hulk, Me Smash'' rage and wrecking havoc across the city with amazing feats of strength, instead we get a 2 hour movie just to explain where Hulks rage comes from.
I liked the look of Ang Lee's version and think Eric Bana is perfect but the movie was trying to make a statement which could've been told and figured out within the first 20 minutes. The beginning of the film was so well done and started the movie well too.
Plus this is Hulk, I wanted to see ''Me Hulk, Me Smash'' rage and wrecking havoc across the city with amazing feats of strength, instead we get a 2 hour movie just to explain where Hulks rage comes from.
Greengoblin
1731 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Well the filmmakers of this film's goal is to make a real crowdpleaser.
System
79987 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Greengoblin
Well the filmmakers of this film's goal is to make a real crowdpleaser.
Ang Lee's goal was to piss off the fans.
fistoflegend
946 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
I think they should leave hulk alone for about a good ten years until CGI technology improves. Maybe then they can do a good realistic hulk that doesn't look phony. Or maybe they should just do the entire thing in CGI like they did the new tmnt movie.
System
79987 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
I think they should just paint some retarded body builder green and be done with it.
Greengoblin
1731 Posts
16 years, 6 months ago
Well the Hulk himself here looks less cartoonish then the last one and looks more realistic all the way.
I wonder if this Hulk will be able to fly too.