Second, why did you let your kid on the Internet unsupervised? Seriously, if you don't watch kids like hawks when they're surfing, they're bound to do "naughty" things.
I've seen "angry soccor moms" go into forums (Usually Forums their kids have no business on in the first place) and just go off.
Like for example, on Fanfiction.net, a mother got mad because her four year old saw an NC-17 (Or "M" as they now call it) story with the word "Tampon" in the title.
Okay, first of all, the site hides the NC-17(M) stories, so the kid had to have clicked on the filter to see it. Second, why did you let your kid on the Internet unsupervised? Seriously, if you don't watch kids like hawks when they're surfing, they're bound to do "naughty" things.
A person shouldn't have to have things kept from the just because of their age.
So you think a 12 year-old should be permitted to drink and smoke as long as it's explained to them how unhealthy it is?
4 years old?! That's on the parent right there. I thought that there were blocker programs that don't let you go to sites that you do not want your kid to see.
So you think a 12 year-old should be permitted to drink and smoke as long as it's explained to them how unhealthy it is?
i don't think that is what they meant....
You're right, it was more in relation to pornography and whatnot. Either way, parents SHOULD keep young kids AWAY from such things.
Any particular reason why you think that things like that should be hidden from kids?
yes, the parents should take control over their kids
It shouldn't. Four year-olds watching bukkake videos is a utopian future.
So you're saying that it's perfectly fine for a person to watch (and do) something like that if they're over 18? You're saying that a person would automatically want to do that if he/she is under 18?
4 years old?! That's on the parent right there. I thought that there were blocker programs that don't let you go to sites that you do not want your kid to see.