are the 00s retro now?

  • GTA3Manana_fan
    avatar
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 374
    DebrisStorm wrote:
    Goddammit no. Fucking aspie retards always trying to put a fucking label on something. Last year is not fucking retro. Don't be a dumbfuck.


    Umad? LOL i laugh how you're trying to be a hard-ass over the Web.

    Swear moar please.

    1999 - 2003 is RETRO in My Fucking opinion and YOU are NOT going to change that, dream on. I don't care what you say... It will be retro one day. :L
    In memoriam: "A 2002"
    1987 - 2005
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Neomysterion
    avatar
    • 1 year 10 months ago
    • Posts: 895
    		 Maybe just another 10 or so years. Most 2000s stuff dies pretty fast in my opinion. :P
    Sketch wrote:
    It's always been my opinion that you can never be too nice but it's not good to let people walk all over you either.


    TRG Forums|[url=http://vgcollect.com/Neomysterion]My Game Collection[
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Deleted
    • 1 year 10 months ago
    • Posts: 54340
    		 http://www.retrojunk.com/details_articles/7961/

    good effing lord
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Neomysterion
    avatar
    • 1 year 10 months ago
    • Posts: 895
    		 I had to see the comments to believe what you were saying Ben. Just because a TV network pulls the plug off a good newer TV series (or a short shelf life), just doesn't mean that it will become retro faster, I had to learn that the hard way.
    Sketch wrote:
    It's always been my opinion that you can never be too nice but it's not good to let people walk all over you either.


    TRG Forums|[url=http://vgcollect.com/Neomysterion]My Game Collection[
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Deleted
    • 1 year 10 months ago
    • Posts: 54340
    		 it took the guy long enough to figure out what i was saying. that is if he's not still ignoring the points that i've been making, but there've been a few more who were debating on the case in the past couple of years here. sometimes we have this guy to help sort things out with articles that aren't up to par, though he's not on as much a s he used to be these days:

    http://www.retrojunk.com/user/view_profile.php?uid=100571
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • 199478q29
    • 1 year 3 months ago
    • Posts: 233
    • Account Disabled
    		 The early 2000s yes but the mid to late 00s no.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Dyzfunk7ional
    avatar
    • 1 year 3 months ago
    • Posts: 4892
    199478q29 wrote:
    The early 2000s yes but the mid to late 00s no.


    Pfff, tell me some significant changes from early '00's worth to be considered retro. Come on I want to learn something...
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • randomuser2349
    avatar
    • 1 year 3 months ago
    • Posts: 881
    		 I strongly believe that Year 2000 was a retro year, considering that it was vastly different from the rest of the decade. This image tells me why.



    From 2002 onward, I wouldn't consider retro just yet (except technology wise), though the classic feeling for me seems to fade out in 2003.
    signature
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Bishop of Burgers
    avatar
    • 4 days 1 hour ago
    • Posts: 5
    		 The twin towers definitely symbolize a big difference between 2000 and today. Not just the towers themselves, but the impact that 9/11 had on society, politics and the changes that have occured as a result.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
Search
Users Online
© Retro Junk | Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise