are the 00s retro now?

  • badfish
    avatar
    • 3 years 3 months ago
    • Posts: 603
    		 since the 00s are now the previous decade , are we allowed to call it retro now? if not , when can we?
    Sense_of_Self wrote:


    A spoonful of bullshit helps the medicine go down.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • bassman21
    avatar
    • 3 years 3 months ago
    • Posts: 12786
    • User Admin
    		 The early 2000s are for sure, not anything after 1995. I thought this forum would be more popular, but I guessed wrong.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • RetroxBunny
    avatar
    • 2 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 5733
    		 I wonder what the real definition of retro is...
    http://thebest404pageever.com/swf/obamadance.swf

    [quote=ActionBastard]I collect Retro Junk action figures. I've got a limited edition DebrisStorm with karate chop action still in the box. I've also got a special edition vkimo that comes with a typewrit
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Mezase Master
    avatar
    • 2 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 9096
    bassman21 wrote:
    The early 2000s are for sure, not anything after 1995.
    That's quite a contradiction. :?
    TMNT wrote:
    Movin` on up!! To the East side Blah blah Blah Movin on up Gaints lol.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • thabz
    avatar
    • 2 years 6 months ago
    • Posts: 3054
    		 Think of how old you were in 2000.... You were quite young, right?
    Tell me how I'm supposed to breathe with no air?
    Can't live, can't breathe with no air
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Dyzfunk7ional
    avatar
    • 2 years 6 months ago
    • Posts: 4869
    		 Basically this has been tackle in other threads. My point of view is OF COURSE NOT.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • stimpyfan
    • 2 years 5 months ago
    • Posts: 52
    • Account Disabled
    		 I don't consider the 2000's retro, but I think the 2000's would be considered retro, if you were born in like 1999 or something. I think I'd start to call that decade retro in the next about three or four years from now.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • piercedsphynx
    avatar
    • 2 years 5 months ago
    • Posts: 318
    		 Wasn't the whole "what is retro, what's not retro" established in another thread already?
    "Three o'clock is always too late or too early for anything you want to do." :shock:
    Jean-Paul Sartre, Nausea (1938 ) "Vendredi"
    French author & existentialist philosopher (1905 - 1980)

    [img]http://farm5.static.flickr.c
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • GTA3Manana_fan
    avatar
    • 2 years 5 months ago
    • Posts: 374
    		 00s are retro now, yes.
    In memoriam: "A 2002"
    1987 - 2005
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Deleted
    • 2 years 5 months ago
    • Posts: 54340
    		 Goddammit no. Fucking aspie retards always trying to put a fucking label on something. Last year is not fucking retro. Don't be a dumbfuck.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • CleverHans
    avatar
    • 2 years 5 months ago
    • Posts: 1283
    DebrisStorm wrote:
    Goddammit no. Fucking aspie retards always trying to put a fucking label on something. Last year is not fucking retro. Don't be a dumbfuck.


    This.

    stimpyfan wrote:
    I don't consider the 2000's retro, but I think the 2000's would be considered retro, if you were born in like 1999 or something. I think I'd start to call that decade retro in the next about three or four years from now.


    If someone was born in 99, what the hell are they doing here? 11 year olds have no business on a retro site, unless you'd like this site to become even more of a clusterfuck of stupid posts than it already is.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • ActionBastard
    avatar
    • 2 years 4 months ago
    • Posts: 4903
    		 They will be at midnight tonight.
    Shit happens when You fart naked

    Retro pimpin aint easy
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • copper30
    avatar
    • 2 years 4 months ago
    • Posts: 864
    		 No.

    I only consider pre-1997 the retro era.

    Post-1997 is the modern era to me. For movies, the last retro film to me was Hunchback of Notre Dame, for games, the last retro game to me was probably Donkey Kong Country 3.

    Really, modern era is right when the PS1 and N64 came out.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • wilsted1990
    avatar
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 198
    		 2000 could be retro if you're a teenager
    2009 is definitely not retro
    Shao Kahn: You pathetic fools, I've come for your souls!

    Raiden: I don't think so.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • CleverHans
    avatar
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 1283
    		 Teenagers shouldn't be feeling "retro"
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Dyzfunk7ional
    avatar
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 4869
    CleverHans wrote:
    Teenagers shouldn't be feeling "retro"


    Say no more.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • CartoonKing2
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 192
    • Account Disabled
    		 I would consider 2000-2002 to be retro, but nothing after that.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Dyzfunk7ional
    avatar
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 4869
    CartoonKing2 wrote:
    I would consider 2000-2002 to be retro, but nothing after that.


    How can be consider retro something from 8-10 years ago. Theres not much of a difference. Still we use the same technology from early '00's for instance.

    There is no significant changes like VHS to DVD or cassete tapes/CD to MP3. Something retro needs a bit of a history back ground to fall on. This is not achieved in such a short period of time.

    ...well nevermind, you were born in '92

    ....
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • CartoonKing2
    • 1 year 11 months ago
    • Posts: 192
    • Account Disabled
    Dyzfunk7ional wrote:
    CartoonKing2 wrote:
    I would consider 2000-2002 to be retro, but nothing after that.


    How can be consider retro something from 8-10 years ago. Theres not much of a difference. Still we use the same technology from early '00's for instance.

    There is no significant changes like VHS to DVD or cassete tapes/CD to MP3. Something retro needs a bit of a history back ground to fall on. This is not achieved in such a short period of time.

    ...well nevermind, you were born in '92

    ....


    I know. I understand completely what your saying. Now that I think about it, I wouldn't consider them to be "retro". Just some of the early '00s stuff is kind of nostalgic to me. There are some people here on RJ who wouldn't even consider the '90s to be retro, so it all really depends on when you were born.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Dyzfunk7ional
    avatar
    • 1 year 10 months ago
    • Posts: 4869
    CartoonKing2 wrote:
    Dyzfunk7ional wrote:
    CartoonKing2 wrote:
    I would consider 2000-2002 to be retro, but nothing after that.


    How can be consider retro something from 8-10 years ago. Theres not much of a difference. Still we use the same technology from early '00's for instance.

    There is no significant changes like VHS to DVD or cassete tapes/CD to MP3. Something retro needs a bit of a history back ground to fall on. This is not achieved in such a short period of time.

    ...well nevermind, you were born in '92

    ....


    I know. I understand completely what your saying. Now that I think about it, I wouldn't consider them to be "retro". Just some of the early '00s stuff is kind of nostalgic to me. There are some people here on RJ who wouldn't even consider the '90s to be retro, so it all really depends on when you were born.


    Nostalgia and retro are two different things. I feel nostalgia about some of my missing porn DVD's two years ago. Whereas I feel retro watching Linda Lovelace perform.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
Search
Users Online
© Retro Junk | Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise