Hell in a Cell

  • thecrow174
    avatar
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 24039
    		 Did anyone watch Hell in a Cell on Pay-Per-View last night?
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • CARNAGE
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 752
    • Account Disabled
    		 NOPE
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • Mariopower
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 64
    • Account Disabled
    		 Yepper I was over at my girlfriends house watching it.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • JK Yoda
    avatar
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 968
    		 Nope. I think its stupid to have more then one hell in a cell match in one night. Looses its value to me.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • DMoney89
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 3323
    • Account Disabled
    JK_Yoda wrote:
    Nope. I think its stupid to have more then one hell in a cell match in one night. Looses its value to me.


    And when it's head at the same PPV every year. Just like with the Elimination Chamber, HIAC was saved for THE feud and it usually came out of nowhere. The surprise as to when it came sent the crowd into a frenzy and made the anticipation that much greater as to when the next one is gonna be. Now that you know when it's gonna be every year (and like you said, having more than one per night), it ruins all of that.

    Then again WWE doesn't even care how recycled and predictable they are now, so it's not like we should be surprised.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • JK Yoda
    avatar
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 968
    DMoney89 wrote:
    JK_Yoda wrote:
    Nope. I think its stupid to have more then one hell in a cell match in one night. Looses its value to me.


    And when it's head at the same PPV every year. Just like with the Elimination Chamber, HIAC was saved for THE feud and it usually came out of nowhere. The surprise as to when it came sent the crowd into a frenzy and made the anticipation that much greater as to when the next one is gonna be. Now that you know when it's gonna be every year (and like you said, having more than one per night), it ruins all of that.

    Then again WWE doesn't even care how recycled and predictable they are now, so it's not like we should be surprised.


    Totally agree.
    Remember when matches like this actually meant something?
    They should never name a ppv event after a match, its just stupid in my honest opinion. They did a submission ppv not to long ago but a HIAC one? I forgot what the annual ppvs are for each month, but the ones they replaced would have been better then these two. I can imagine them actually having an Ironman match ppv. Matches like the HIAC shouldnt happen more then one time in a single showing.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
  • SSJ Jup81
    avatar
    • 3 years 7 months ago
    • Posts: 11117
    		 That's a no for me. To be honest, I've never watched any PPV thing for Wrestling, 'cept for a couple of Wrestlemania events in the late 90s, and I think I saw the one in 2000 since my cousin was here and ordered it.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
© Retro Junk | Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise