• 1 month 29 days ago
    • Posts: 9804
    grand80sfan wrote:
    thecrow174 wrote:
    ABC Family isn't ALL about family. Remember Slacker Cats?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slacker_Cats


    Will Slacker Cats be on Adult Swim or will Disney XD bring its own line of adult programming on late nights?

    There were only a few episodes in the series, so maybe Adult Swim will show one per week..
    There is a battle between two wolves inside us all.

    One is evil and the other one is good. Which wolf will win? The one you feed the most.

    http://unbelievableyou.com/a-native-american-cherokee-story-two-wolves/
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • 1 month 28 days ago
      • Posts: 41
      Something like that belongs on Adult Swim judging from the preview I saw. That garbage does not belong on a network that's supposed to air family programming as its name implies.
      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • 1 month 27 days ago
        • Posts: 578
        MattNor91 wrote:


        Coming to think of it, I can see that. I also see Disney Channel as kind of the same thing, especially since it has nothing but teenybopper sludge that has nothing to do with the Disney brand most of the time outside of Paul Rudish's hit-or-miss Mickey Mouse TV shorts, not to mention occasional airings of Walt Disney Animation Studios or Pixar fare.

        As for the reason why crap like Kirby Buckets shouldn't be airing, never have I seen a children's program air a scene with a kid vomiting on camera before (yes, I know Rugrats did it a few times, but it involved babies and little children, and didn't do it very often... at least that's how I remember it). During the company's early days as a simple animation studio, Walt Disney would have slapped the tar out of anyone who put in a vomiting sequence and fired him/her on the spot.


        That's because Walt Disney died in 1966, well before it was acceptable on basically any kids station.
        Also, I can name and recall quite a few kids shows that had vomiting, even retro ones. I remember Arthur's sister vomiting spinach out on camera. There was also Rocko's Modern Life where Heffer vomited on Rocko's face after eating a steak. Both of these were rated TV-Y when they first came out. As for the latter, I was quite shocked the first time I saw it considering how much outright dirty and violent humour there was such as someone's thumb splitting open and a fountain of blood coming out, as well as outright cleavage.

        In any case, the vomiting scene doesn't really bother me that much. I've seen much worse in kids shows, such as blatant innuendos and sex humour. Plus, I'm not sure if such scenes will be employed routinely in the show. Ads sometimes only show stuff that are just rare exceptions in the show.

        And AFAIK Disney is more of an empire of companies nowadays, rather than just one company. The Walt Disney Company is composed of many subsidiaries, and I see their expansion nowadays as diversifying (not necessarily in a good way) rather than killing Disney. Only 2 or so of these subsidiaries are responsible for the "true" Disney style, and they are still churning out excellent films worthy of the Disney brand. I don't see how this show discredits Disney anymore than Cooking Mama discredits Square-Enix (Taito is a subsidary of Square-Enix).
        signature
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • 1 month 25 days ago
          • Posts: 41
          randomuser2349 wrote:
          That's because Walt Disney died in 1966.


          That's basically the reason why I rewound time a bit to see how Walt himself would react to this kind of stuff. Yes, I do understand Arthur and Rocko's Modern Like had vomiting scenes, but in their respective cases, the former involved a baby, while the latter isn't basically aimed at an audience that grew up being hardcore Disney fans. I stand by my views when it comes to how I view Disney content.
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • 1 month 23 days ago
            • Posts: 784
            Television nowadays is pretty much a dumping ground for shows that only appeal to the lowest common denominator, and to run the same horrible shows for hours non-stop (History Channel and Food Network, I'm talking to you!). There's a reason why everyone's hopping on the Netflix and premium cable bandwagon.
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              • 1 month 23 days ago
              • Posts: 41
              Agreed. However, Pawn Stars is good every now and then for escapism, not to mention there is at least educational value due to the valuable goods brought into the pawn shop actually having history behind them, plus you actually learn about their background.
              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              Search