stake n sheak wrote:
Fuzz wrote:
Unfortunately, "flashy, popcorn flicks built around special effects" isn't really specific examples.
Bad Boys, Armageddon, The Rock, The Island?
I asked for specific examples of his filming style that are unique to his movies. Nobody ever seems to be able to come up with anything besides explosions and CGI. Lots of movies have explosions and CGI effects. That's a poor agrument, and is no different as saying his films suck because people speak in them.
stake n sheak wrote:
Fuzz wrote:
That could be said for a lot of movies nowadays, not just Michael Bay films. We've only seen a few moments of the new TMNT film so far. How can you possibly says that how it's going to be?
How many chances are we supposed to give to a certain person or studio? There comes a point where you've been disappointed so many times, you stop expecting to like what they do.
But what chances does he need? Not many of Bay's films, if any, are financial failures, which is perfectly obvious by the number of people that continue to go see them. They may not be winning any Oscars, but they are always entertaining. If a movie is entertaining, than I'd hardly call that failure.
The only people that seem to be complaining nowadays are the Transformer fanboys, and now the TMNT fanboys, because they're "childhoods have been raped." That such a stupid statement. Nothing from your childhood has changed. Bay hasn't magically gone back in time and change anything. Everything that you remember from back then that was awesome is still awesome.
These new turtles are just a modern re-imaging of a 30 year old franchise. I really can't understand the hate for the way the turtles look. People complaining that they have lips and nostrils now. Well why the hell wouldn't they? They're humanoids. Humans have lips. Humans have nostrils. Turtles have nostrils? If they were CGI versions of their comic book/cartoon counterparts, they would look ridiculous on film. I remember this same exact arguments about the Transformers movies.