• 11 months 2 days ago
    • Posts: 47
    • Globally Banned
    randomuser2349 wrote:
    Well there is a 2000's section now, so I fail to see how it doesn't belong here.
    If it was back in 2011 and before when there was only up to the 70's-90's sections then I'd say there's a problem.


    2000 is fourteen years ago...but 2005 is only nine.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • 11 months 2 days ago
      • Posts: 47
      • Globally Banned
      vkimo wrote:
      Anyone can submit an article on practically anything, regardless of topic, time frame, quality, etc. The readers hold the power to filter these articles with voting. If more readers are into 00s stuff than those who aren't then the articles will stay on the front page. If more people feel the article is inappropriate or lacking, then the can vote it to the back pages. It's just a matter of majority. Apparently more people still hold that the 00s are too recent giving most of the 00s articles are in the negatives. Basically we all need to chill out and let nature weed out things.


      The difference between 2000 and 2005 is 5 years - that's half a decade, not five minutes.
      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • 11 months 2 days ago
        • Posts: 2340
        • Forum Mod
        • Editor
        CareBearCheer wrote:
        vkimo wrote:
        Anyone can submit an article on practically anything, regardless of topic, time frame, quality, etc. The readers hold the power to filter these articles with voting. If more readers are into 00s stuff than those who aren't then the articles will stay on the front page. If more people feel the article is inappropriate or lacking, then the can vote it to the back pages. It's just a matter of majority. Apparently more people still hold that the 00s are too recent giving most of the 00s articles are in the negatives. Basically we all need to chill out and let nature weed out things.


        The difference between 2000 and 2005 is 5 years - that's half a decade, not five minutes.


        you should probably cool it for now. You're free to post in the existing threads but don't make anymore rant topics.
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • 11 months 2 days ago
          • Posts: 1784
          CareBearCheer wrote:
          You're just assuming what I was hoping to achieve
          CareBearCheer wrote:
          I just want to make sure that there are enough differences between 2000 and 2013 to make it "safe" to post a year 2000 article on here.







          CareBearCheer wrote:
          So what were you saying?
          tangspot2 wrote:
          Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • 11 months 2 days ago
            • Posts: 578
            CareBearCheer wrote:
            randomuser2349 wrote:
            Well there is a 2000's section now, so I fail to see how it doesn't belong here.
            If it was back in 2011 and before when there was only up to the 70's-90's sections then I'd say there's a problem.


            2000 is fourteen years ago...but 2005 is only nine.


            Did people in 2010 write about stuff from 1999?
            signature
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            Search