Thread: Children posting retro articles???!!!

    • 2 years 4 months ago
    • Posts: 47
    Quote by randomuser2349
    Well there is a 2000's section now, so I fail to see how it doesn't belong here.
    If it was back in 2011 and before when there was only up to the 70's-90's sections then I'd say there's a problem.


    2000 is fourteen years ago...but 2005 is only nine.
      • 2 years 4 months ago
      • Posts: 47
      Quote by vkimo
      Anyone can submit an article on practically anything, regardless of topic, time frame, quality, etc. The readers hold the power to filter these articles with voting. If more readers are into 00s stuff than those who aren't then the articles will stay on the front page. If more people feel the article is inappropriate or lacking, then the can vote it to the back pages. It's just a matter of majority. Apparently more people still hold that the 00s are too recent giving most of the 00s articles are in the negatives. Basically we all need to chill out and let nature weed out things.


      The difference between 2000 and 2005 is 5 years - that's half a decade, not five minutes.
      • avatar
        • 2 years 4 months ago
        • Posts: 2434
        Quote by CareBearCheer
        Quote by vkimo
        Anyone can submit an article on practically anything, regardless of topic, time frame, quality, etc. The readers hold the power to filter these articles with voting. If more readers are into 00s stuff than those who aren't then the articles will stay on the front page. If more people feel the article is inappropriate or lacking, then the can vote it to the back pages. It's just a matter of majority. Apparently more people still hold that the 00s are too recent giving most of the 00s articles are in the negatives. Basically we all need to chill out and let nature weed out things.


        The difference between 2000 and 2005 is 5 years - that's half a decade, not five minutes.


        you should probably cool it for now. You're free to post in the existing threads but don't make anymore rant topics.
        My Last Article For RetroJunk

        Remembering RetroJunk
        • avatar
          • 2 years 4 months ago
          • Posts: 1974
          Quote by CareBearCheer
          You're just assuming what I was hoping to achieve
          Quote by CareBearCheer
          I just want to make sure that there are enough differences between 2000 and 2013 to make it "safe" to post a year 2000 article on here.



          Quote by CareBearCheer
          So what were you saying?
          Quote by tangspot2
          Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
          • avatar
            • 2 years 4 months ago
            • Posts: 591
            Quote by CareBearCheer
            Quote by randomuser2349
            Well there is a 2000's section now, so I fail to see how it doesn't belong here.
            If it was back in 2011 and before when there was only up to the 70's-90's sections then I'd say there's a problem.


            2000 is fourteen years ago...but 2005 is only nine.


            Did people in 2010 write about stuff from 1999?
            signature
            Forum Staff
            Super Admin: Vertex
            Super Mods