 -
1 year 1 month ago
- Posts: 878
| stake n sheak wrote: vkimo wrote: They should do remakes of movies that were actually bad! It just makes more sense.
It does make more sense. Too much sense for it to ever happen.
Except for The Thing, which Pinface remade to great acclaim in 1982.
NO, The Thing is not a goddamn "remake" of the 1951 movie, they have very little in common other than alien and snow. Carpenter's film is so different than the "original", there never was a movie called "The Thing" in 1951 just The Thing from Another World, sure Carpenter threw in 2 homages like circle of men and similar opening title card but everything about them like the location, the characters and their backgrounds, the discovery/origin of the spaceship, the monster, the nature/methods of the alien etc are both different from each other. I consider them 2 separate and completely different adaptations of the same original source material being called "Who Goes There" by John W Campbell. The 1951 movie was a VERY loose adaptation and one of the worst book to film adaptations of all time as it completely ignored the book, Carpenter's film is a standalone film that is an EXCELLENT adaptation of the source material. Carpenter may had loved Hawks's film but he didn't intended to do a remake of the earlier film but instead go back to the real source material and he stated his film is no remake it's a separate film that it is it's own movie and a faithful adaptation.
Remakes and re-adaptations are 2 completely different things, remakes refer ONLY to films based on FILMS themselves that aren't based on source material but original films and original screenplays like say The Blob for instance, a TRUE remake. Re-adaptations are separate adaptations of original source material (comics/novellas/novels) like say Dracula, I Am Legend, The Thing, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Carrie, Girl with Dragon Tattoo, War of the Worlds, Batman Begins etc.
Calling The Thing a "remake" is like saying I Am Legend is a "remake" of Omega Man or Omega Man being a "remake" of Last Man on Earth, NO they are all separate adaptations of the same source material and have nothing to do with each other.
|