• CruJonesIsTheMan
    • 1 year 7 months ago
    • Posts: 381
    		 The Raimi Spiderman movies haven't ages poorly. The costume looks great. Especially when you compare it with the trash costume from the newest crap movie. The one good thing about the new movie is that he has the tech webshooters as Spiderman should have.
    Don't pay any attention to the evil spirited and dead of heart. They're not worth your time.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
    • thecrow174
      • 1 year 7 months ago
      • Posts: 9808
      		 I've been so busy running my mouth in this thread, I never said what movie(s) didn't age well.

      I will say Death Wish.
      There is a battle between two wolves inside us all.

      One is evil and the other one is good. Which wolf will win? The one you feed the most.

      http://unbelievableyou.com/a-native-american-cherokee-story-two-wolves/
      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • System
        • 1 year 7 months ago
        • Posts: 74809
        CruJonesIsTheMan wrote:
        The Raimi Spiderman movies haven't ages poorly. The costume looks great. Especially when you compare it with the trash costume from the newest crap movie. The one good thing about the new movie is that he has the tech webshooters as Spiderman should have.


        I respectfully disagree, I thought The amazing Spiderman was good. I love how this version of spiderman is more of a wise ass like he is in the comics. The only thing I didn't like was the portrayal of Peter Parker. I'm sorry, but I have a hard time believing that a guy looking like Andrew Garfield would be treated like an outcast.

        edit: I guess while I'm here, I should mention a film that I think is dated... I would have to go with the hulk movie made in 2003. The special effects really did not age well, the hulk himself especially looks quite out of place.
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • vkimo
          • 1 year 7 months ago
          • Posts: 2325
          • Forum Mod
          • Editor
          		 I actually prefer the first hulk. Maybe not in terms of special effects. I just think they captured his attributes better. Like how the madder he gets, the bigger he gets. He seemed like more of a uncontrollable beast which I liked. He seemed was less stronger in the second movie. In the first he could jump a few miles, swing tanks around, etc.
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • eddstarr88
            • 1 year 7 months ago
            • Posts: 6887
            		 Notice that HULK movies couldn't do justice to the character until this century. The oversized guy really needs massive computer effects that simply were not available back in the days of the Bill Bixby television series.

            It seems to me that comedy does not age well in all films. I've noticed that "Caddyshack" is not on many favorites lists lately.
            The Eldorado is dead. Long live the Eldorado.
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • PixarFan88
              • 1 year 7 months ago
              • Posts: 613
              		 What about all those awful parody movies? Those are guaranteed to age poorly (or do those not count?).

              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              • retroman
                • 1 year 7 months ago
                • Posts: 702
                • Globally Banned
                PixarFan88 wrote:
                What about all those awful parody movies? Those are guaranteed to age poorly (or do those not count?).


                We shall see besides I'm not a fan of those rip off movies
                Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
                Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                Search
                Users Online