eddstarr88 wrote:
Man vs. Monster: the monster attacks, can it be stopped before it attacks again? Roger Ebert used this theme to cover all of the themes listed by S n S in his earlier post as "Man vs X". The "monster" can be another man, or a machine, or even the main character's psyche - the monster within.
You know, it's interesting. You can pack all of those themes into one type as Siskel and Ebert do, or you can use that one type to describe all plots as my fourth grade English teacher did. (The Quest is often comprised of Man vs. Nature [traveling over great expanse of land] and/or Man vs. Man [a battle during or after the trip]. Rags to Riches is a story of someone struggling in society to overcome the obstacle of being a loser--Man vs Man.)
After some thought, I have realized that the Siskel & Ebert system is better for readers or viewers. It hints at the content of the story and what sort of events can be expected. Meanwhile, the English Teacher system (possibly) works better for writers, while they are in the process of building the concept and structure of the story.
I learned this in (I think) fourth grade, while we were reading A Wrinkle In Time. The other thing we learned at the time was plot structure.
