 -
1 year 11 months ago
- Posts: 1774
|
Oh how arcology concept gets my brain spinning. I think they are a very good and workable concept. I was discussing them on another forum once and a guy who was against them asked if I had ever lived near a turkey farm. He said that he had, and the smell was unbearable for miles around. Therefore an arcology is bad because we need to have turkey farms and nobody wants to live near one.
That is a ridiculous notion. For as much as we need to eat meat (and I question that, even though I occasionally take part myself and do enjoy), I can't think that the methods of mass production currently employed by Perdue et al are healthy for us. Even if we don't care about the birds, I'd prefer not to eat something that smells so horrible for miles around. The turkey farm reeks because the turkeys are on top of each other, shitting and rotting. We don't need to make food that way even if it is more profitable. Especially since an arcology in its correct state produces little or no outputs of waste, and needs to sustain only itself.
Anyway. The first paragraph on that page is exactly what I've been saying.
wrote: over the years the Fantastic World of Tomorrow's gotten ... cheaper, simpler, and -- most tragically of all -- the future's gotten too damned small. Here's a guy with the right idea.
The way things are structured now, I don't think we can see such societies or structures in the next few centuries. Besides the financials we need planning, cooperation, contribution, things most people aren't willing to do right now. Even if they agree with the idea which is a huge hurdle in itself. But just as an example, there are free building materials littering the world, such as bottles and tires. Imagine hundreds or thousands of people working together, could make quite an amazing building. It's not quite like Soleri's pictures, but the result can be similar in use.
|