I realize I'll probably get several sarcastic answers, but here goes....was my article on Bauhaus really that boring, bad etc., or is it just that there's very little interest for the subject in the first place? Just seeking some opinions, trying to figure out how to write a better article, etc., thanks.
My guess is that not many RJ readers have a clue who the hell Bauhaus are. That's not necessarily always a bad thing, because it gives you a chance, if you're a good enough writer, to introduce them to your subject matter.
My take on your article was that it was a bit too picture heavy, which made what you wrote seem somewhat minimal. While I agree that you should've fleshed it out a bit more, the work you did do was far overshadowed by the pictures.
I know they always say "add pictures" but sometimes moderation is the key. Less is often more.