Controls
- 5 years 10 months ago
- Posts: 404
I heard that a lot of you, especially everybody, expected Roland Emmerich's prehistoric tale, 10,000 BC to fail in opinion and generally, AND IT DID!!! Not only all of you forbid yourselves to see that film generally, and not only everybody hates 10,000 BC in your opinions, it also gross only $93 million at the US Box office!
And I knew that either Emmerich must learn to make good and better films, or else, and much worse,I fear that a person like a critic or so will not only put a bullet on his head to kill the director, but will also end his life and career as well, both inside and outside of his native Germany!
I knew that a lot of people wanted to punish people like Uwe Boll, Michael Bay, and even Roland Emmerich himself, for their attempts to make good and better films, but most wanted to punish Uwe Boll for all his stuff he makes!
As for 10,000 BC, all of you detractors called this a terrible and horrible film, and even consider it to be his worst effort since Godzilla 1998. All of you and I know a lot of people who are being publicly slapped for daring to mention that movie's title. But despite the uproar over 10,000 BC, I hope that the film's creatures and effects would still influence other films (like some in my Dexter's Odyssey project), for, besides the music by Harald Kloser (the film's co-producer) and Thomas Wander, it is the only other great and would-be-influential aspect of 10,000 BC.
I have questions. How many people dread this film and how many expect it to fail and it did? What are the only great and good aspects of 10,000 BC? The Creatures and Effects? Or the music by the film's co-producer, Harald Kloser, and Thomas Wander or both? Or what?Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
