When Does Something Become Retro? | Retro Junk

Breadcrumb

Controls

Activity
- Last Active Threads

Prev
1
2
3
4
Next

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet?

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

stake n sheak 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 1774	Orangejuice90s wrote: stake n sheak wrote: Prove it. Why don't you prove that it's not right since other people here have said 15 years too! I have already proven a lot of things and you still argue or ignore them. It's your turn. See my thread in war room and reread the linked threads if you're too dense to know what I'm talking about. And, if if everybody agrees with you so much why are your last two posts here "correcting" somebody?
	tangspot2 wrote: Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	March 2013 update. 2013 = current (this year) 2012-2010 = recent (1-3 years ago) 2009-2004 = dated (4-9 years ago) 2003-2000/99 = old school (10-13/14 years ago) 1999/98-1984 = retro (14/15-29 years ago) 1983-1964 = vintage (30-49 years ago) 1963-1914 = golden old (50-99 years ago) 1913 and back = antique and beyond (100+ years ago)

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	stake n sheak wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: stake n sheak wrote: Prove it. Why don't you prove that it's not right since other people here have said 15 years too! I have already proven a lot of things and you still argue or ignore them. It's your turn. See my thread in war room and reread the linked threads if you're too dense to know what I'm talking about. And, if if everybody agrees with you so much why are your last two posts here "correcting" somebody? I've updated the statuses for March 2013.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

retroman 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 702 Globally Banned	Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic
	Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

retroman 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 702 Globally Banned	Orangejuice90s wrote: March 2013 update. 2013 = current (this year) 2012-2010 = recent (1-3 years ago) 2009-2004 = dated (4-9 years ago) 2003-2000/99 = old school (10-13/14 years ago) 1999/98-1984 = retro (14/15-29 years ago) 1983-1964 = vintage (30-49 years ago) 1963-1914 = golden old (50-99 years ago) 1913 and back = antique and beyond (100+ years ago) Reasonable
	Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

retroman 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 702 Globally Banned	Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new. I was born in 1993
	Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new. I was born in 1993 That makes you a 2000s kid.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

stake n sheak 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 1774	[quote=Orangejuice90s][quote=stake n sheak] Orangejuice90s wrote: I've updated the statuses for March 2013. Holy shit. Completely unrelated and the opposite of what I was talking about. Who gave you any authority or qualifications to say this stuff? They need a bullet to the face.
	tangspot2 wrote: Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

retroman 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 702 Globally Banned	Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new. I was born in 1993 That makes you a 2000s kid. I still fancy myself a 90's kid but yes i am a 2000's kid
	Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	[quote=stake n sheak][quote=Orangejuice90s] stake n sheak wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: I've updated the statuses for March 2013. Holy shit. Completely unrelated and the opposite of what I was talking about. Who gave you any authority or qualifications to say this stuff? They need a bullet to the face. What's the matter? Are you getting angry? Maybe therapy wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. Or some pills.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

stake n sheak 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 1774	Orangejuice90s wrote: What's the matter? Are you getting angry? Maybe therapy wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. Or some pills. Nope. But I will take any pills you have on hand, if they're the fun kind.
	tangspot2 wrote: Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	stake n sheak wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: What's the matter? Are you getting angry? Maybe therapy wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. Or some pills. Nope. But I will take any pills you have on hand, if they're the fun kind. I wonder how long you'll last throwing around insults and swear words. Surely, you are violating retrojunk's rules.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

stake n sheak 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 1774	Orangejuice90s wrote: I wonder how long you'll last throwing around insults and swear words. Surely, you are violating retrojunk's rules. :yawn: I think our mods are smart and cool (unlike you) enough to notice I'm only going after one person and there's a damn good reason for it. And don't call me Shirley!
	tangspot2 wrote: Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Orangejuice90s 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 134 Globally Banned	stake n sheak wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: I wonder how long you'll last throwing around insults and swear words. Surely, you are violating retrojunk's rules. :yawn: I think our mods are smart and cool (unlike you) enough to notice I'm only going after one person and there's a damn good reason for it. And don't call me Shirley! Shirley? I though you were stake n sheak. I also don't see why you'd need to "go after" me. I'm not the one throwing curse words.

	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Thatdudeinthehoodie 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 64	retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new. I was born in 1993 That makes you a 2000s kid. I still fancy myself a 90's kid but yes i am a 2000's kid The whole "What is a 90's kid" thing can pretty much be broken down to this. 1980 - 1992 is a 90's kid But if your born before 1995 and appreciate the 90's culture and the decade as a whole then you would be an honorary 90's kid.
	Thats right I ran over the Taco Bell dog...... I got banned from Taco Bell for life.
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

stake n sheak 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 1774	Orangejuice90s wrote: I also don't see why you'd need to "go after" me. I'm not the one throwing curse words. Well I've told you "why" like fifteen times. But of course you remain clueless. And what's wrong with curse words? Nervous Xian?
	tangspot2 wrote: Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

retroman 1 year 8 months ago Posts: 702 Globally Banned	Thatdudeinthehoodie wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: retroman wrote: Orangejuice90s wrote: Kamen Rider RX wrote: I think some stuff from the early 2000's feels a bit dated, the stuff from the mid 2000's like 2004 or late 2000's like 2007 doesn't feel dated as something from the 80's or 90's. I think our pop culture as changed very little since those years in my opinion. Yes, but being dated shouldn't be confused with being retro. Something from 2008 is dated already, but it's hardly "back in the day" material. Stuff from the past 5-9 years might be a little dated Yes, dated. But not retro, or even old school. But 10-20 can be retro 10 would be old school. Retro would be more like 15-29. Is that so Well, think about it. Would you call Finding Nemo retro yet? Yes because it's already considered a classic It's an "old school" classic perhaps but people born in 1997 could remember it being new. I was born in 1993 That makes you a 2000s kid. I still fancy myself a 90's kid but yes i am a 2000's kid The whole "What is a 90's kid" thing can pretty much be broken down to this. 1980 - 1992 is a 90's kid But if your born before 1995 and appreciate the 90's culture and the decade as a whole then you would be an honorary 90's kid. I am a honorary 90s kid
	Hoping to explore pop culture from the 20th Century with you
	Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes \| No

Prev
1
2
3
4
Next

stake n sheak viewing: Official Categories
bklynbren viewing: Official Categories >Chit Chat
kniche83 viewing: Official Categories >Memory Lane >NEED ORIGINAL BROADCASTS FOR CLASSIC TV SITE!!!

Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise