• 6 years 6 months ago
    • Posts: 6051
    • Globally Banned
    Is 2001 retro???
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • 6 years 6 months ago
      • Posts: 3309
      :!:

      :roll:
      Game... ovahhhhhhhhh!!!
      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • 6 years 6 months ago
        • Posts: 2009
        • Globally Banned
        Not yet in my opinion, and i beleive that something becomes retro in no less than ten years.
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • 6 years 6 months ago
          • Posts: 795
          gumbyman wrote:
          Not yet in my opinion, and i beleive that something becomes retro in no less than ten years.


          Id give it 15. 1998 doesnt seem quite retro yet.
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • 6 years 6 months ago
            • Posts: 3309
            You wouldn't call Pokémon Red and Blue retro? :?

            Well I do suppose you had to be a part of it to be nostalgic...
            Game... ovahhhhhhhhh!!!
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              • 6 years 6 months ago
              • Posts: 5947
              • Account Disabled
              id sayyyyyyyyyyyy maybe in 5 years. i think something becomes retro when u remember it now and realize u dont see it these days.

              like the old G4TV/TechTV.
              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                • 6 years 6 months ago
                • Posts: 883
                2001 would be retro in 2010...I think. :?
                I am Ricky, hear me think! :D
                Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                  • 6 years 6 months ago
                  • Posts: 5
                  I'd say 10 years minimum, but that's just me.Retro is just another way of saying that something is nostalgic, classic, or iconic. Retro is subjective, after all. To me, Blade Runner is retro greatness, but some people may just view it as just another movie. Retro is subjective, so give the person who made this thread a break. :evil:
                  Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                    • 6 years 6 months ago
                    • Posts: 387
                    Most people on this site think 2001 is retro and thats a dman shame
                    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                      • 6 years 6 months ago
                      • Posts: 74809
                      Bomberman wrote:
                      You wouldn't call Pokémon Red and Blue retro? :?

                      Well I do suppose you had to be a part of it to be nostalgic...


                      I wouldn't call Pokemon retro at all.
                      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                        • 6 years 6 months ago
                        • Posts: 1751
                        Not this again.
                        Coming Soon to Nostalgia Junkie: Nostalgiathon 2009!
                        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                          • 6 years 5 months ago
                          • Posts: 82
                          Nothing made in the 2000s just yet.
                          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                            • 6 years 5 months ago
                            • Posts: 70
                            NOT UNTIL VH1 MAKES An "I LOVE" SPECIAL ON IT DOES IT BECOME RETRO!!
                            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                              • 6 years 5 months ago
                              • Posts: 441
                              theoutlawtorn1080 wrote:
                              NOT UMTIL VH1 MAKES An "I LOVE" SPECIAL ON IT, DOES IT BECOME RETRO!!

                              They DO have it for the 2000s now...I Love the New Millenium! I just saw it last weekend!
                              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                • 6 years 5 months ago
                                • Posts: 74809
                                ChicagoSheriff wrote:
                                Most people on this site think 2001 is retro and thats a dman shame


                                Yes, I totally agree.
                                And there's also some people here who think they are 90' kids when they were actually born in the mid/late 90's, that's a shame.
                                Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                  • 6 years 5 months ago
                                  • Posts: 784
                                  When the 2010's come, soon on this site (if it still exist), the people that will join this site will be born in the mid to late 90s and then will start getting threads like "Nickelodeon was better in the 00s, now it sucks." Well we're not gonna approve of that.
                                  Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                    • 6 years 5 months ago
                                    • Posts: 2400
                                    ChicagoSheriff wrote:
                                    Most people on this site think 2001 is retro and thats a dman shame


                                    I think it has something to do with 9/11.
                                    [img]htt
                                    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                      • 6 years 5 months ago
                                      • Posts: 12
                                      Something becomes retro when it's more a part of past popular culture than present. 2000+ isn't quite retro yet--too much like today. 10-15 years seems about right.
                                      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                        • 6 years 5 months ago
                                        • Posts: 155
                                        TheOmniscient wrote:
                                        Something becomes retro when it's more a part of past popular culture than present. 2000+ isn't quite retro yet--too much like today. 10-15 years seems about right.


                                        well said.
                                        LIFE'S A BEECH.......THEN YA MARRY 1.... :lol::lol:
                                        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                          • 1 year 10 months ago
                                          • Posts: 134
                                          • Globally Banned
                                          It goes like this as of February 2013:

                                          2013 = current
                                          2012-2010 = recent
                                          2009-2004 = dated
                                          2003-2000 = old school
                                          1999-1984 = retro
                                          1983-1964 = vintage
                                          1963-1914 = golden old
                                          1913 and back = antique and beyond
                                          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                                          Search