• 6 years 8 months ago
    • Posts: 5947
    • Account Disabled
    "Crossover Chaos!"
    http://www.retrojunk.com/details_articles/2796/

    I just wanna ask a few questions about my previous article.

    Now, Im the kind of guy who accepts positive AND negative criticism as well, but what i wonder why my article received negative, then later, positive reviews.

    And was there anything wrong with it, like the setup or whatever?

    just wonderin'.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • 6 years 8 months ago
      • Posts: 586
      • Globally Banned
      I don't know why there was a shift from positive to negative. I guess people just have differing opinions. You get much respect, though, for being open to criticism.

      I thought your previous article was much MUCH too long, and all over the place. I felt you would've been better served to narrow the field down and pick the more important crossovers to write more about and flesh out. (Though I think the length of your article did contribute unintentional meaning to the title "Chaos.";)

      For example: I would've been happy with an article that simply focused on the crossover aspect of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit." A little research into that topic might've uncovered some fascinating details that we hadn't known before. (It might also have been interesting for you to write it!)

      Take my most recent article on "Full House" for example. (Not that I'm bragging; I just don't know which other article to use.) I could've written an article listing all of my favorite 80's shows, and done a quick blurb on Full House and gone on. But that would've received average ratings, maybe. Instead, I decided to zero in on Full House. And here's a key point: I didn't re-tell the plot of the show. I chose to write about where the actors are now. I assume that the reader knows about the show and doesn't need me to recap the plot. And quite frankly, they could read the back cover of the DVD and get that information anyway.

      And I did some research. This is what the majority of bad article writers here completely fail to do. I actually took time and checked on my facts--which in the end turned out to be fun, because I got to watch some great videos of Jodie Sweetin from "Pants Off Dance Off" and got to go back and re-read some correspondence I had earlier from Candace.

      Here's a couple of key points:

      (1.) Know what you're writing about inside and out. People will call you on your B.S. if you don't.

      (2.) Find out stuff that you didn't know before, and research your topic thorougly. If you tell us stuff we already know, why do we need your article? On the other hand, if we learn something, we're all better for it, right?

      (3.) Have fun with your topic! If you have fun with it and go all-out, I will have fun with it too.

      (4.) Grammar check. Spell check. I don't care if you don't care. Other people will care, and they will not take you seriously, no matter how much you think that it sucks for them to be that way.

      (5.) When in doubt, don't submit. Keep it for a while and work on it till you're just too dang proud of it to keep it to yourself anymore.

      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • 6 years 8 months ago
        • Posts: 2212
        Pants Off Dance Off? Interesting.
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • 6 years 8 months ago
          • Posts: 504
          I see my article got accepted on the site, and I already submitted earlier when I didn't have a good feeling inside me. I feel the same as I guess some people will hate it at first and then some will start liking it.
          [center][img]http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n290/CSL1/Total%20Trash/R
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • 6 years 8 months ago
            • Posts: 5947
            • Account Disabled
            Research eh? I guess i shouldve expanded my resources by not limiting myself to wiki and google.
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              • 6 years 8 months ago
              • Posts: 1438
              • Account Disabled
              Never use wikipedia as article source, sometimes the information is incorrect.
              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                • 6 years 8 months ago
                • Posts: 586
                • Globally Banned
                Wikipedia is okay to get started with, but you ALWAYS need to double check the facts with other more reliable sources. Otherwise, you might end up looking foolish.

                I actually thought your Toaplan article was much better. Still needs some refining, but you're on the right path.
                Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                  • 6 years 8 months ago
                  • Posts: 5947
                  • Account Disabled
                  oh i always double check...it just doesnt ALWAYS have what u might need to know...sometimes.
                  Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                    • 6 years 8 months ago
                    • Posts: 26
                    • Globally Banned
                    knuclear200x, don't listen to velcrohead. you tried your best and its all that matters. no one on here is going to write a professonial article. this guy needs to get it in his head that the articles on here are written by casual writers.
                    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                      • 6 years 8 months ago
                      • Posts: 5947
                      • Account Disabled
                      ah...he has good points, and youre also right, i did try my best. I got all the pictures I could, all the important info I could think of... and besides it was my first BIG article. Though i am casual i still thrive to give out a great high rank article like the rest of you guys, thats all.
                      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                      Search