I noticed that too. and like I said earlier. I was born in 73. I'm an 80s kid.

if you still were to young to walk around the block by yourself when a decade ended. You are not a kid of that decade. and the person here who was born in 92. I hate to break it to ya but you are a 00's kid.

And I still disagree with you. I was a "kid" in the 80s longer than I was a "kid" in the 90s. To me, kids are those 12 and under. I'd actually argue 10 and under.

In other words, I lived my life as a "kid" in the 80s. For the majority of the 90s, I lived it as a teenager.

im a 90s kid and damned proud of it, ya hear me?i fucking hate it when jerks born in like 1993 automatically assume that they are 90s kids just cos they were born in the 90s.it makes a mockery of the whole situation.a mockery,i tells ya.

First post?
Rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.
I wonder who the hell THAT is.

I know some people who would say they were a child of the 60's even though they were born well after that decade, they're just pseudo hippies and choose to embrace part of that decade...the music and the fashion, etc. When you were born does not necessarily dictate which decade you associate with.

I had a lot of pop culture influence in the 80's because my siblings were teenagers and so I was exposed to a lot of 80's things other than what a child would be exposed to (my fave song when I was 3 was "Another Brick in the Wall" but I am not an 80's kid cause I like 90's pop culture better, mainly the music.