Cambion wrote:
Ehh, it seems anymore that 'horror' has become synonymous with 'gory' - the theory that, the more blood there is, the more horrific the film will be. But a good horror film has the ability to scare the fuck out of you without excessive blood.
Seems that the older films of the aforementioned genre are the best - most of the shit that's come out in the last 8 years wasn't that good. Spectacular special effects, but were they really needed?
I think the greatest ruse in film is not showing when a person has been killed or showing the aftermath of a gruesome attack - this leaves what has happened up to the viewer's imagination, and I think the viewers are more capable of producing something unthinkably horrific with their own minds...more horrific than any director ever could, because what strikes one person as horrific may make another person feel indifferent. And since everyone has a different sense of what constitutes horror, what they perceive as the outcome of a bloody encounter in a movie will be that much more profound to each individual person, as opposed to the gory or horrific scene being shown to them on the screen. I think that made sense.