- stake n sheak viewing: Official Categories
- Caps 2.0 viewing: Official Categories >Fan-artsy fartsy >Some sketches I did
Controls
Thread Locked

- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
I'd ignore him, as reading obviously isn't his strong suit. Notice how he conveniently leaves out information and take quotes out of context to suit his views?PirateNinja6 wrote:Has anyone told you you're very mature?Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
Now this, I do agree with. I do find it pointless for everything to go Digital by next year. That just means, for me anyway, no more television. My television doesn't have Digital Cable. My parents' television and my grandmother's does, though. There are some stations I already can't see, like CN and G4.liukangx wrote:Tv has another point of sucking.
All digital by Feb. 2009? I have cable but I know there are people that still use the Bunny ears. I know a lot of old folks use that Tv setup still.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No - 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 1438
- Account Disabled
SSJ_Jup81 wrote:I'd ignore him, as reading obviously isn't his strong suit. Notice how he conveniently leaves out information and take quotes out of context to suit his views?PirateNinja6 wrote:Has anyone told you you're very mature?
Seriously. It's really no use of arguing with him. All he does is whine and bashes our opinions just because they are different from what he thinks.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 3919
SSJ_Jup81 wrote:Now this, I do agree with. I do find it pointless for everything to go Digital by next year. That just means, for me anyway, no more television. My television doesn't have Digital Cable. My parents' television and my grandmother's does, though. There are some stations I already can't see, like CN and G4.liukangx wrote:Tv has another point of sucking.
All digital by Feb. 2009? I have cable but I know there are people that still use the Bunny ears. I know a lot of old folks use that Tv setup still.
I don't see where anyone would get the idea it is the right time, its like if al the sudden everything said "High def only" not every has so why exclude these people?
its not like making it all digital is suppose to make a difference its not a upgrade to anything just a downgrade and middle finger to some peopleAre you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 2492
- Globally Banned
Retro1986 wrote:It's not my fault that I had all the correct points about how 90's tv was better then today's and you guys had none. Don't cry just because your the only few that likes it. More power to ya!
I argee with you, but insulting people left and right makes you look a twit.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 429
[quote=SSJ_Jup81]Sunni, I don't think it was ever stated that children of today don't like old programming. What was said was that it shouldn't be expected if they don't, and actually, I was referring to it the other way around, not vice-versa. [quote]
No offense, but this statement is a little confusing. Retro1986 was talking about that and I was agreeing with him that children don't like those shows simply because they weren't exposed to them.wrote:We as adults have no reason or right to complain about shows aimed at a young audience of today because we're not the demographic or even in the age range. We're the young group of yesterday, not today. The shows aren't meant to appeal to us nor is it being made to cater to us. Getting right down to it, I have more of a problem with adults complaining about kids shows than most anything else, and then turn around and compare it to what they watched, which was probably equally bad or corny or whatever.
I don't just complain about kids shows. I complain about a lot of today's television. I just happened to be talking about kids shows because of Retro1986's comment. And the only reason that it's a concern for me is because I plan on having kids someday and I don't want them to grow with bad role models like Jamie Lynn Spears and such. I have a cousin who is 3 and is into Hannah Montana. To me, that seems a little extreme. Shouldn't a girl that age be watching something a little more educational? I just have the feeling that my cousin is going to grow up with bad values and I don't want that happen to my kids. TV teaches children a lot more than you might think. Obviously it is a parent's responsibility to be teaching good values, but having a child's role models taking skanky photos of themselves or worse is certainly no help. That is the only reason I'm complaining. I do have legitimate concerns for the future.wrote:The main thing I do agree with, and I'm sure most can, is that it's sad that most of these kids don't have exposure to some of the older cartoons, and I'm not talking about the 80s/90s stuff. I mean the golden age/era of cartoons, like from Warner Bros and Tex Avery.
I was talking about the golden age of cartoons 30s-50's, but I was also referring to what I think is the golden age of TV 80's-90's. While I love the stuff from my childhood and realize that not everyone could, I can't imagine anyone not liking Popeye and the Flintstones and all the other classics including the live action shows like I Love Lucy and Dick Van Dyke.Recipe for nostalgia: Mix 80's and 90's culture. Stir in some good memories. Add a dash of reflection. Mixture should now taste bittersweet. Shake well and enjoy!Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
I was only referring to children's programming and how adults shouldn't be complaining about them, especially those who sit around and complain about shows aimed at preschoolers, like Dora the Explorer or whatever else Nick Jr. shows.Sunni wrote:No offense, but this statement is a little confusing. Retro1986 was talking about that and I was agreeing with him that children don't like those shows simply because they weren't exposed to them.Aside from the fact that Hannah Montanna sings, what's wrong with her? I honestly don't know much about her. Has she done anything particularly bad? I honestly find more wrong with Bratz dolls and girls emulating that as opposed to girls imitating a teeny bopper singer.Sunni wrote:I don't just complain about kids shows. I complain about a lot of today's television. I just happened to be talking about kids shows because of Retro1986's comment. And the only reason that it's a concern for me is because I plan on having kids someday and I don't want them to grow with bad role models like Jamie Lynn Spears and such. I have a cousin who is 3 and is into Hannah Montana.I'm not certain. When I was three, I was into cabbage patch dolls, Get Along Gang, Shirt Tails, etc. Aside from moral values, these shows weren't really educational.Sunni wrote:To me, that seems a little extreme. Shouldn't a girl that age be watching something a little more educational?To be honest, the only way I could see this applying, is if the parents let the television raise their kids.Sunni wrote:I just have the feeling that my cousin is going to grow up with bad values and I don't want that happen to my kids. TV teaches children a lot more than you might think. Obviously it is a parent's responsibility to be teaching good values, but having a child's role models taking skanky photos of themselves or worse is certainly no help. That is the only reason I'm complaining. I do have legitimate concerns for the future.My mother hates Popeye cartoons (although I like 'em) and I don't know anyone who actually likes I Love Lucy around me. I'm not a big fan of I Love Lucy myself, but I don't dislike it, but I also don't see why it's so popular, although, I can understand, given when it came out, how it possibly became popular.Sunni wrote:I was talking about the golden age of cartoons 30s-50's, but I was also referring to what I think is the golden age of TV 80's-90's. While I love the stuff from my childhood and realize that not everyone could, I can't imagine anyone not liking Popeye and the Flintstones and all the other classics including the live action shows like I Love Lucy and Dick Van Dyke.
That aside, you're right. Retro1986, though, doesn't seem to understand that.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 429
SSJ_Jup81 wrote:I was only referring to children's programming and how adults shouldn't be complaining about them, especially those who sit around and complain about shows aimed at preschoolers, like Dora the Explorer or whatever else Nick Jr. shows
The only reason I complain about Dora is that I think it's sending a message to kids that learning Spanish is more important than learning English. I know it's important to learn another language and that kids have the greatest capacity for learning before age 12, but I think it's better suited for school or specialized language training programs for kids. Dora and Diego just seem like political propaganda of sorts and that's why it bothers me. I don't complain about anything else Nick Jr. shows.wrote:"Aside from the fact that Hannah Montanna sings, what's wrong with her?"
wrote:"I honestly don't know much about her. Has she done anything particularly bad? I honestly find more wrong with Bratz dolls and girls emulating that as opposed to girls imitating a teeny bopper singer."
I never said she had done anything bad, although my gut feeling is that she will sooner or later. And you're right about the Bratz dolls. I'd never give my kid something like that to play with. It's no small wonder to me that girls nowadays have so little respect for themselves. I was into Cabbage Patch dolls myself. As far educational shows I meant shows from PBS or shows that encouraged creativity.
I wasn't raised by the television, but I remember it had a lot of influence over me and how I looked at things. A child doesn't have to be raised by the television to have it alter the way they behave.
You're actually the first person I've talked to that doesn't like I Love Lucy. Everyone else I know thinks it's a great show. Perhaps it's just a matter of taste.Recipe for nostalgia: Mix 80's and 90's culture. Stir in some good memories. Add a dash of reflection. Mixture should now taste bittersweet. Shake well and enjoy!Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 3919
Well I am off the point of talking about kids shows now(going to just pick up and bootleg dvds I can find at Bestbuy and the internet)
and I don't really hate Miley Cyrus anymore, since I ...
anyway, it is easier and makes more sense to point out Teen shows,but I am glad Saved by the Bell is still on. thats what I always wanted High school to be like.And some stand up acts are great (D.L. Hughley acts are great, he always talks about growing up).
Thats some our problems, we have to grow up and we are just afraid to and don't want to. It was just to easy and fun being a kid. you are happy, no responsibilities,and you always felt safe because you didn't really understand the government or what they were doing.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
I never thought much of it. I think it's a cool concept, actually. Exposure to something new at a young age. Besides, this is an immigrant country, so I don't see a problem. I wish there would've been stuff like that when I was a kid. I do know that in Elementary school, first grade anyway, we had to watch some show where we learned random words in Spanish and French, and I had a lot of fun with that. Too bad they didn't do anything past then, but by the time 8th grade rolled around and I took Spanish I, I did remember some of my colors.Sunni wrote:The only reason I complain about Dora is that I think it's sending a message to kids that learning Spanish is more important than learning English. I know it's important to learn another language and that kids have the greatest capacity for learning before age 12, but I think it's better suited for school or specialized language training programs for kids. Dora and Diego just seem like political propaganda of sorts and that's why it bothers me. I don't complain about anything else Nick Jr. shows.This is where our opinions differ. I don't assume the worst in people.Sunni wrote:I never said she had done anything bad, although my gut feeling is that she will sooner or later.I don't understand the fascination with them. Bratz dolls make Barbie dolls tame.Sunni wrote:And you're right about the Bratz dolls. I'd never give my kid something like that to play with. It's no small wonder to me that girls nowadays have so little respect for themselves.I see what you mean. I used to watch PBS a lot as a child, but I'm sure they still show creative shows on there still. I know PBS still shows Sesame Street...well, probably. I dunno. I, honestly, was never a big fan of Sesame Street, surprisingly. I preferred Reading Rainbow and Mr. Roger's Neighborhood to it, especially Reading Rainbow since I always liked reading the books that the show promoted. I used to watch that Lamb Chop show too. Hm, another show that emphasized creativity was definitely Muppet Babies, even though it wasn't on PBS.Sunni wrote:I was into Cabbage Patch dolls myself. As far educational shows I meant shows from PBS or shows that encouraged creativity.In this case, it probably depends on the child. I wasn't raised by the television either, but, aside from the goofy stuff, it didn't have much of an affect on me. Oh, and as for goofy stuff, I'm referring to stuff like Lionel Richie's Dancing on the Ceiling. I actually thought that was possible to do.Sunni wrote:I wasn't raised by the television, but I remember it had a lot of influence over me and how I looked at things. A child doesn't have to be raised by the television to have it alter the way they behave.
I don't really hate it, I just don't care for it. It's not anything I'd rush home to watch. Now I do thoroughly enjoy the other shows you mentioned, like the Dick Van Dyke show.Sunni wrote:You're actually the first person I've talked to that doesn't like I Love Lucy. Everyone else I know thinks it's a great show. Perhaps it's just a matter of taste.
One old show that I can think of, that I did rush home for, was The Partridge Family. I loved watching that when younger and I even do now. To me, it's a whole lot more realistic than what The Brady Bunch was, even though The Brady Bunch, is a guilty pleasure. I still like that, minus the 1969 season. Too many gender stereotypes...although, it should be expected given the time period.
Another series I like and dislike is the Jetsons. I don't care for the 60s versions for the gender-based stereotypes and George's male chauvinistic ways. Now the 80s version I liked since they did away with George's, "A woman's place is in the home" mentality.
That aside, the only types of shows that I do miss that the 80s and 90s did have, are sitcoms, but the popularity of those have died out. I can't expect television to cater to just me.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
That's what I meant earlier by viewing stuff through rose-colored glasses. Some people just are holding on to the past too much. Nothing wrong with remembering the good things in the past, but one shouldn't hold onto it either and bash left and right because things changed from when you were a child. I had loads of fun as a kid. I liked how I'd play outside all day or play outside with my dog or playing original Sonic the Hedgehog on the Sega and Super Mario Bros on the NES and going to the movies and having my Looney Toons meal every Friday night and playing with my toys and waking up uber early for Saturday morning cartoons, which I looked forward to at the end of the week and reading my Ramona books and Dr. Dolittle and Judy Blume titles and watching Sweet Valley High and Flash Forward and Ready or Not as a teen, etc. I miss how simple life seemed to be, but of course, that's because I was a kid.liukangx wrote:Well I am off the point of talking about kids shows now(going to just pick up and bootleg dvds I can find at Bestbuy and the internet)
and I don't really hate Miley Cyrus anymore, since I ...
anyway, it is easier and makes more sense to point out Teen shows,but I am glad Saved by the Bell is still on. thats what I always wanted High school to be like.And some stand up acts are great (D.L. Hughley acts are great, he always talks about growing up).
Thats some our problems, we have to grow up and we are just afraid to and don't want to. It was just to easy and fun being a kid. you are happy, no responsibilities,and you always felt safe because you didn't really understand the government or what they were doing.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 429
[quote=SSJ_Jup81]I never thought much of it. I think it's a cool concept, actually. Exposure to something new at a young age. Besides, this is an immigrant country, so I don't see a problem. I wish there would've been stuff like that when I was a kid. I do know that in Elementary school, first grade anyway, we had to watch some show where we learned random words in Spanish and French, and I had a lot of fun with that. Too bad they didn't do anything past then, but by the time 8th grade rolled around and I took Spanish I, I did remember some of my colors.[quote=Sunni]
You what's funny? In the later 90's when I was also too old for Nick Jr., it wouldn't have bothered me. But since the world seems to have changed so much since 9/11, I have started really looking at things and analyzing them. It's given me a more negative perspective on this decade, I won't deny that. But it hasn't completely changed me because I'm still optimistic that things will start getting better in the next decade. Aside from that, I think the whole Dora thing is just part of my new way of thinking of the world, but that might be getting too philosophical.
And you are right about my assuming the worst in people. It's my worst fault and I'm still trying to overcome it.
Oh yeah. And I never actually saw The Partridge Family. I've been wanting to for awhile but it's never on TV land. At least, I've never seen it on there.Recipe for nostalgia: Mix 80's and 90's culture. Stir in some good memories. Add a dash of reflection. Mixture should now taste bittersweet. Shake well and enjoy!Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
Technically, I was too old for it by the time the early 90s rolled around.Sunni wrote:You what's funny? In the later 90's when I was also too old for Nick Jr., it wouldn't have bothered me.
It's interesting how some shows that were apart of Nickelodeon later on became a part of Nick Jr. Noozles come to mind and Adventures of David the Gnome. Then again, earlier Nick Jr.'s block ended at like 12:00. Then it was like that time up to 8:00 for Nickelodeon, and then 8:00pm - 6:00 am for Nick@Nite, not counting Saturdays when SNICK started up. I would say Sunday, since they used to show Looney Toons on Nick@Nite.I actually find the view an interesting one. Feel free to elaborate.Sunni wrote:But since the world seems to have changed so much since 9/11, I have started really looking at things and analyzing them. It's given me a more negative perspective on this decade, I won't deny that. But it hasn't completely changed me because I'm still optimistic that things will start getting better in the next decade. Aside from that, I think the whole Dora thing is just part of my new way of thinking of the world, but that might be getting too philosophical.Well, for me, until a person does something wrong, I don't want to make the assumption that he or she will, and if someone does, I focus on why. For instance, Britney Spears seems to be having lots of issues, but given the way she's acting, to me, she seems to have bipolar disease. She acts like it to me.Sunni wrote:And you are right about my assuming the worst in people. It's my worst fault and I'm still trying to overcome it.There was no TV Land yet, to my knowledge, when reruns were shown. I used to watch this back in the early 90s on Nick@Nite. WGN also used to show it. I recall its coming on at 6:30 in the evenings after Saved by the Bell.Sunni wrote:Oh yeah. And I never actually saw The Partridge Family. I've been wanting to for awhile but it's never on TV land. At least, I've never seen it on there.Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 248
Everyone I know has watched I Love Lucy and so did I. That show is a classic and I still watch it to this day with my nephews and nieces.
I personally don't consider 80s/90s shows to be classic since they are too recent and a lot of the shows weren't that good and seriously overrated.
I do consider TV cartoons like the Flintstones and Yogi Bear to be classics because they had a wide appeal and have been exposed to a lot of generations. Like with TV shows, I don't consider 80s/90s cartoons to be classics for the simple fact that they didn't have a wide appeal and most people who was out of the target audience of Saturday morning and weekday afternoon cartoons (14 and under) weren't watching. Today's cartoons have this problem as well. There are some 90s cartoons that I consider neo-classic (i.e. Pinky and the Brain, Animaniacs, Batman TAS etc) because those did have the wide appeal. In my eyes, almost all 80s cartoons were definitely for kids. I don't see how anyone over the age of 13 can watch them and still enjoy them. Ask a 11 year old kid what is GI Joe or Thundercats. Now ask them who is Scooby Doo or Bugs Bunny. Chances are, they will be more familiar with the latter than the former.
And according to Rodney Dangerfield, the golden age of TV is the 50s, not the 80s and 90s.
And I definitely agree with that.
*waits for incoming flame posts*Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No 
- 6 years 4 months ago
- Posts: 4806
I feel that Hiro made a very good point and it was way better than what I was attempting to do. Seems that most shows are limited to a specific age group (80s & 90s), as opposed to the real old stuff. Of course, as you pointed out, some 90s stuff was aimed at both children and adults, and seems it was mostly the Warner Bros stuff. The kids could enjoy the slapstick, while the adults could enjoy the jokes. Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No



