Thread: RJ Wikipedia article deleted

    • 10 years 2 months ago
    • Posts: 35
    Anybody know why RJ's article on Wikipedia was deleted?
    Marcus Aurelius-
    "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not wan
    • avatar
      • 10 years 2 months ago
      • Posts: 2399
      Quote by nachtjager
      More than likely it was 14 year olds editing it to the point of "ZOMG RJ R0X0rs mY s0x0RS".


      Yeah. Someone did something similar to Killswitch engage's article last night.
      [img]http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/2403/12031h.gif[/img]
      [img]http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/9004/43146.gif[/img]
      [img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/9751/42805.gif[/img]
      [img]http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/7183/11940.gif[/img]
      [img]htt
      • avatar
        • 10 years 2 months ago
        • Posts: 3503
        Because admins on Wikipedia are jerks.
          • 10 years 2 months ago
          • Posts: 74775
          Because Retro Junk doesn't actually exist.
          • avatar
            • 10 years 2 months ago
            • Posts: 4965
            Quote by Gitoku
            Because Retro Junk doesn't actually exist.


            There is no spoon.
            • avatar
              • 10 years 2 months ago
              • Posts: 6044
              Because Wikipedia is Serious. Business.
              I must enter a signature.
              • avatar
                • 10 years 2 months ago
                • Posts: 9763
                Because it was most likely spam.

                Just like how the oldschool4life wikipedia article got deleted.
                  • 10 years 2 months ago
                  • Posts: 74775
                  Quote by Xe-A-Thoul;302017
                  Because Wikipedia is Serious. Business.


                  Internet. Serious Business.
                  • avatar
                    • 10 years 2 months ago
                    • Posts: 6044
                    The hell? Wasn't this topic CLOSED!?
                    I must enter a signature.
                    • avatar
                      • 10 years 2 months ago
                      • Posts: 9763
                      I didn't do anything

                      it was open when I posted in it earlier :
                        • 10 years 2 months ago
                        • Posts: 35
                        Quote by Gitoku
                        Because Retro Junk doesn't actually exist.


                        Do you mean because it's a website? Plenty of websites have Wikipedia articles.
                        Marcus Aurelius-
                        "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not wan
                        • avatar
                          • 10 years 2 months ago
                          • Posts: 6029
                          Retrojunk is like the town of Brigadoon.
                            • 10 years 2 months ago
                            • Posts: 74775
                            Quote by IWannaBeSedated
                            Do you mean because it's a website? Plenty of websites have Wikipedia articles.


                            But there are tons of people that don't know it exists. I mean, this is sort of an obscure site. That is until it gets bought out by a bigger company and turns ugly like TV.com.
                            • avatar
                              • 10 years 2 months ago
                              • Posts: 601
                              Wikipedia spam? I don't even remember the retrojunk article removed.
                              • avatar
                                • 10 years 2 months ago
                                • Posts: 3356
                                I think it's a good thing that RJ isn't massively popular. We should keep it cult-like.
                                [img]http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d148/mr3urious/H_3728_42.jpg[/img]

                                "I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I'm not." -Kurt Cobain
                                • avatar
                                  • 10 years 2 months ago
                                  • Posts: 6044
                                  Maybe you're right. We already have active posters and the like... though, like some poster made a topic about, Family Guy mentioned Retro Junk (in some commentary or something), if enough people saw it, think it'd get more popular?
                                  I must enter a signature.
                                    • 10 years 2 months ago
                                    • Posts: 587
                                    ha i never even thought of a Wikipedia RJ article.
                                    • avatar
                                      • 10 years 2 months ago
                                      • Posts: 617
                                      Well if it aint on here: http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?cc=US&ts_mode=country&lang=none it ain't getting a wikipedia page, so my experience has taught me. Its rather ironic Wikipedia has a crap load of pages on sports players Ive never even heard of, yet not rather scrit when it comes to websites.
                                      Forum Staff
                                      Super Admin: Vertex
                                      Super Mods
                                      Search