• 1 year 8 months ago
    • Posts: 134
    • Globally Banned
    stake n sheak wrote:
    Orangejuice90s wrote:
    By that logic something could be just a few years old and be "retro".

    Such as what?


    These days, certain items go out of style or common use quite quickly. I'm sure it will be rare for people to still be doing the Gangnam Style in 2016. Retro is 1999 and earlier, although technically it should be 1998 since 1999 is only fourteen years ago. People are leniant on 1999, because the 90s is otherwise retro.
    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
      • 1 year 8 months ago
      • Posts: 1774
      Orangejuice90s wrote:

      These days, certain items go out of style or common use quite quickly. I'm sure it will be rare for people to still be doing the Gangnam Style in 2016. Retro is 1999 and earlier, although technically it should be 1998 since 1999 is only fourteen years ago. People are leniant on 1999, because the 90s is otherwise retro.

      Gangnam Style is a fad that may have run its course. But it is a techno song. Techno is still a currently popular style. Hence it does not fall under the banner of being unlike the current style.
      tangspot2 wrote:
      Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
        • 1 year 8 months ago
        • Posts: 134
        • Globally Banned
        stake n sheak wrote:
        Orangejuice90s wrote:

        These days, certain items go out of style or common use quite quickly. I'm sure it will be rare for people to still be doing the Gangnam Style in 2016. Retro is 1999 and earlier, although technically it should be 1998 since 1999 is only fourteen years ago. People are leniant on 1999, because the 90s is otherwise retro.

        Gangnam Style is a fad that may have run its course. But it is a techno song. Techno is still a currently popular style. Hence it does not fall under the banner of being unlike the current style.

        techno song.


        If you are still coming to RetroJunk in 2016 and haven't been banned by that time for anger management problems, why not report how many people have still been doing the dance? I don't remember the Macarena dance being done in the year 2000.
        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
          • 1 year 8 months ago
          • Posts: 1774
          WAY TO MISS THE POINT (AGAIN)
          tangspot2 wrote:
          Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
          Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
            • 1 year 8 months ago
            • Posts: 134
            • Globally Banned
            stake n sheak wrote:
            WAY TO MISS THE POINT (AGAIN)


            What point? Typing in capital letters is like shouting. Did you know that a lot of people shout when they are angry?
            Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
              • 1 year 8 months ago
              • Posts: 328
              i don't mean to be rude or off topic here but save this type of thing for the war room
              Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                • 1 year 8 months ago
                • Posts: 134
                • Globally Banned
                sharkbate wrote:
                i don't mean to be rude or off topic here but save this type of thing for the war room


                This ain't a war. I'm just calling a spade a spade and stake n sheak is acting insecure.
                Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                  • 1 year 8 months ago
                  • Posts: 1774
                  tangspot2 wrote:
                  Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
                  Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                    • 1 year 8 months ago
                    • Posts: 1774
                    Orangejuice90s wrote:
                    stake n sheak wrote:
                    WAY TO MISS THE POINT (AGAIN)


                    What point?
                    the point that just because one example (for instance, a song) of something (in the same instance, the genre) is no longer popular does not mean it's retro nor that that is what Pinwheel meant he or she said something (at a scale larger than single pieces of work) is retro when it's out of style.

                    /\ I whispered there so you know I'm not angry. Sorry I didnt mean to SCARE YOU!
                    tangspot2 wrote:
                    Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
                    Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                      • 1 year 8 months ago
                      • Posts: 134
                      • Globally Banned
                      stake n sheak wrote:
                      Orangejuice90s wrote:
                      stake n sheak wrote:
                      WAY TO MISS THE POINT (AGAIN)


                      What point?
                      the point that just because one example (for instance, a song) of something (in the same instance, the genre) is no longer popular does not mean it's retro nor that that is what Pinwheel meant he or she said something (at a scale larger than single pieces of work) is retro when it's out of style.

                      /\ I whispered there so you know I'm not angry. Sorry I didnt mean to SCARE YOU!


                      By that logic, a movie from 1950 is too new to be retro, because there have been movies in 2013. You also can't scare me when you are probably miles away from me.
                      Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                        • 1 year 8 months ago
                        • Posts: 1774
                        By that logic, by that logic, by that logic, a song from 1950 can't be retro because there is music in 2013!

                        I can tell a movie from 1950. The film stock, the wardrobe, the cars, the makeup, the special effects, everything about it is unlike the current style.

                        What you are saying is like saying that a phone booth is not retro, because it is only six years old (because I saw one in 2007 and it still worked.)

                        Imagine you are a person who had no knowledge of music, historically or currently. I know this will be difficult, because you have a lot of trouble empathizing or taking yourself out of your own head. But try. Imagine you are such a person. Maybe you have lived in Amish country your whole life. Now, imagine that from that situation, you come into modern mainstream society and you wish to learn all about music. You visit a prominent music theory teacher or a well-regarded music critic. He has you sit down and takes through all the history of recorded music. You listen to it all and you take notes about when different songs and styles were in the public consciousness (because you are studying to be a decadologist, of course.) You understand jazz and electric blues and honky tonk and folk and countryand country & western and gospel and rhythm & blues and rock and rock & roll and metal and punk and rap and hip hop and industrial and grunge and r&b and techno and all the subgenres in between. This extensive education of popular music takes three years. You have learned when each of these styles was first popular, when they had revivals, the most important examples of each, who were the major players, etc. It is now 2016. But you never heard Gangnam Style. Technopop music, as in 2013, is still popular. (I don't know if this will be the case. But remember, we are "pretending.";) Your teacher finally gets around to playing Gangnam Style for you. Can you tell the difference between it and a newer song that is also techno pop? No, you cannot. It's time as a fad is long gone, yet it is still in the mode of current music. There are still many other things that are very similar to it. Yet there is nothing like a phone booth or cassette tape still being used by many people. That is The Difference.

                        Nobody by any logic said anything that could be construed by a non-psychotic person to mean that Gangname Style is retro. Yet you came to that conclusion that somebody was saying something equivalent.
                        tangspot2 wrote:
                        Mrs. stake you say some nasty on my threads. Dirty bitch
                        Are you sure you want to delete this post? Yes | No
                        Search