Care Bears' Dark Side (Pt. 1)

This article holds some of the cons in the Care Bears franchise.

Alright, my previous article was not a very big hit. That was just something I felt like doing in honor of it being my 20th article. If you're expecting me to do that again, then you're wrong. Anyway, let's get on to business. This is a REAL article.

I was a huge Care Bears fan in the 80's, but if you've read my previous Care Bears article, you may already know that. The Care Bears movies from the 80's hold some of my fondest childhood memories. Well, there is one exception.

"The Care Bears Adventure in Wonderland" sucks. I mean this movie is bad. How bad? Well, it's undeniably the worst of the Care Bears trilogy, but I also find it to be one of the worst movies of the decade. Now, from a kid's perspective, it may be enjoyable. When this movie came out, I was such a big Care Bears fan that I just accepted it, but looking back at it now, I just gotta come clean and tell you that this movie is garbage. Now, if you like this movie, I don't have a problem with that, because this is all just my opinion. If you read my other Care Bears article, you may already know that I hate this movie, so why am I reviewing it again? Well, I felt that I didn't go into enough detail in my previous review, so I thought I'd go through it a little better and point out this movie's flaws.

For one thing, it's the plot. The first two movies are about the Care Bears helping out a couple of kids and making sure everyone shares their feelings with others, and they're trying to stop some villain causing chaos and hatred all over the world. This movie, however, is nothing like that. In this movie, the White Rabbit (who seems to be the uncle of Swift Heart Rabbit) has come to Care-a-Lot and asked some of the Care Bears to help him find the princess of Wonderland. They find this girl named Alice and end up going to Wonderland to save the princess and stop an evil wizard. Making a movie about the Care Bears in Wonderland? Sure, that makes sense. It makes about as much sense as putting Josie and the Pussycats in outer space.

Another problem with this movie is the voice acting. In the first two movies, Tender Heart Bear was voiced by Billie Mae Richards, but in this movie, Jim Henshaw does his voice. I mean, what the heck? Those voices don't even sound remotely close to each other. Don't try to fool me. I think I can recognize Billie Mae Richards' voice. I watch "Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer" annually. This Tender Heart sounds more like he has a sore throat or something. Tender Heart should go to bed.

Another thing that disappoints me is the use of characters. In the first two movies, every single Care Bear and Care Bear Cousin was used, but in this movie, the cast was only narrowed down to a fraction of the cast. The only Care Bears involved in this adventure are Tender Heart, Grumpy and Good Luck Bear. The only Care Cousins involved were Brave Heart Lion, Lotsa Heart Elephant and Swift Heart Rabbit. The fact that Playful Heart Monkey wasn't involved really pissed me off, because he was my favorite character.

A lot of the stuff in this movie just doesn't do it for me. I mean, we've got a catepillar who acts like a traffic cop, the Queen of Hearts is friendly and not interested in chopping off people's heads, and the Cheshire Cat is a rapper. Putting a character who raps in a Wonderland-themed media will make it automatically bad. If you've seen the TV series, "Adventures in Wonderland", you'll know what I'm talking about.

The last real major flaw I want to point out is the songs. Unlike the previous two movies, the songs in this movie are not very catchy or memorable. Also, there's too many of them. How many? Well, let's recap the songs in the previous movies starting with the first one:

There's the Care-a-Lot theme song. That's one.

Then there's the song when the Bears give Kim and Jason the tour of Care-a-Lot. That's two.

Then there's the song they do in the Forest of Feelings. That makes three.

Then we've got the Care Bear Cousin call. That's four.

Then there's the chase sequence song. Okay, so that's five.

Then finally, there's the Care Bear family song at the end. That makes a total of six songs in the first Care Bears movie. Okay, that's acceptable.

Now let's see the second one:

Well, there's the soft song at the beginning. That's one.

Then there's the "Flying Colours" song. That's two.

Then there's the song where John and Dawn are changing the cubs' diapers. That's three.

Then we got the growing up song. That's four.

Then there's the fight song. That's five.

Then there's the love song that plays during the closing credits. So once again, we've got six songs. Another acceptable effort.

Now the third one:

There's the "Rise and Shine" song (which is the only real good song in the movie). One.

The search for Alice. Two.

The Wonderland theme song. Three.

The Cheshire Cat's first rap. Four.

The Wizard's song. Five.

The Mad Hatter's song. Six.

The Cheshire Cat's second rap. Seven.

Then there's Grumpy's rap at the closing credits with the Cheshire Cat joining in. That gives us a grand total of eight songs in the movie. That's way too many!

I mean, it's not like that's a problem. Wonderland-themed movies have been known to have a lot of musical numbers. Disney's "Alice in Wonderland" had a total of 14 songs plus 8 other songs that were not used in the movie, and that's probably the most songs Disney has ever used in any of their animated classics. But the bottom line is if you're going to make a movie with such bad concept, you should cut down on the musical numbers.

Not too surprisingly, "The Care Bears' Adventure in Wonderland" lead to a financial failure after its theatrical release. And believe it or not, Nelvana was planning on making another Care Bears movie the very next year called "The Care Bears Nutcracker Suite". Did it get made? Well, yes, and it was intending to be released theatrically, but due to the financial failure of the Wonderland movie, it aired on the Disney Channel instead. Not very many kids saw it anyway, since this is late 1988 that we're talking about, and most kids were getting into a new fad that had just made the scene. (You guessed it! The Ninja Turtles.) The Nutcracker movie ended up being the series finale of the Care Bears TV series.

That's right. Caught inbetween all these movies, there was a Care Bears TV series. Tune in next time, and I'll tell you all about it.
Log in to comment on or rate this article. You can even write your own!
Comments
    tyciol Posted 2 years 8 months ago
    Considering how often the 'dark wonderland' theme is done I was half expecting this to contain that kind of theme. One of these days I do believe someone will grab the Care Bears theme and run with it.
    TreyVore Posted 5 years 4 months ago
    Thumbs up from me, this is pretty informative. The only thing you left out is the part where you hold up a copy of the movie and the tape almost slides out of the box.
    Fangarius Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Actually TV, nothing is 100% original. You can literally find something based on something else, that's not the point. DL expresses his topics the way he knows how and should be commended for that expression, not deconstructed because there may or may not be similar elements from another person's style.

    Instead of griping about what is and isn't original about an author's work, whether it's an article, essay or even book, you should rather enjoy more on how they convey the topic first hand.

    The real problem here is, you guys focus and concern over so much how and where DL obtained his style, you overlook the purpose of why he composes these articles: to share his love with nostalga.

    If you desire of being hypercritical about this, I suggest then you start responding in websites like Propeller and other news sites than submitting opinions here in RetroJunk.

    And let the ones submitting articles enjoy sharing their views in the way they know how.

    In other words, if you can't provide constructive feedback, then don't provide anything at all.

    'Nuff Said.
    Tv_Themes Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    The problem is, DL is being unoriginal.
    Fangarius Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Uh, Dan, if you bothered to read my post, just because someone uses a similar phrase or clause in their article, it does NOT constitute as plagarism. Basically plagarism is when you take something verbatim and claim it as your own.

    The thing is DL here is discussing Care Bears NOT TMNT, therefore, it's not considered as such. Otherwise, by your definition Jeff Smith should be sued by the Walt Kelly estate since he implements a similar lettering style and art type with his Bone and other series.

    Yet, no one accuses Mr. Smith as of such. As I said before, stop nitpicking, enjoy the article and stick with the topics, please!
    Dan5121 Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    yeah I noticed the plagiarism too
    "but looking back at it now, I just gotta come clean and tell you that this movie is garbage."
    Remembered that line from Angry Video Game Nerd's TMNT 3 review..
    Fangarius Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Guys, C'mon, you're really straying from the topic. WHO CARES about the similiarities between two persons' articles. That's not the point. You can find similiarities in just about anything. Flintstones was an animated version of The Honeymooners, just with kids later on. Top Cat, Sgt. Bilko from Phil Silvers, except TC was an alley cat, Bilko a conniving sergeant in the army.

    And the list goes on. The truth is, I've read DL's writings and most of them aren't anything like this guy you're talking about, seems to me you're just wanting to harp and nitpick about something rather than discuss the topic here at hand.

    Personally, until you get a poser who attempts taking your character you've done for over 30 years, and claims it as his/her own, THEN you can complain whether or not something was plagiarized or originally done.

    A few here need to grow up and move on. Life's far too short for one to dissect and scrutinize on one's writing styles rather than simply enjoy the article's topic for what it is.

    [Apologies, DL, I know you wanted to discuss this privately, but I wanted the two who are ragging you to know how I felt and I find it strange after so many articles you've penned, they're NOW just bringing up these accusations. As far as I'm concerned you write extremely well and get your message across, it's not your fault if some close-minded people can't look past similar components in completely different articles.]
    dalmatianlover Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Alright. I will not take any more talk about this. If you want to discuss this with me any further, let's do it through PM, but not here.
    Tv_Themes Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Ok, lets put up some examples.

    AVGN: He counted up all the battle scenes in TMNT 3
    dalmationlover: He/She counted up all the songs in CB3

    Seems similar to me. In this next example I will quote the Nerd while bleeping out obscenities.

    AVGN: This Movie is bad, how bad? Is it the worst in the trilogy? Oh undeniably but thats not my point, my point is that this is the worst *bleep* movie I have ever seen in my life.

    Dalmationlover: "The Care Bears Adventure in Wonderland" sucks. I mean this movie is bad. How bad? Well, it's undeniably the worst of the Care Bears trilogy, but I also find it to be one of the worst movies of the decade.

    Sounds like DL took the Nerds script and reworded it to make it sound like his/her own words. Then there is the Nerd complaining about the way the Turtles mouth move and how raspy Splinter sounds. DLs mention of how they didn't give Tender Heart his DIC voice (as I like to call it) reminds me of the Nerd. Oh and guess what? Part 2 of this review reminds me of another AVGN video. Click into the next article and I'll tell you all about it.
    dalmatianlover Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    You just totally said what I did NOT do! If I were to copy the AVGN's review on TMNT3 as a 100% plagarism, I would have rewritten the entire script and replaced every "Ninja Turtles" with "Care Bears"! That would have been impossible to do since it would have taken me weeks to write out the script (he doesn't keep his transcripts handy online), plus, more than 50% of the stuff he said would not have worked for this article. Here you are accusing me of plagarism, yet you don't even know how to spell the word "plagarise". I suggest you reread this article more carefully, because not every paragraph is taken from the work of the AVGN.
    sonmanic Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    It’s not the idea that AVGN cares that he’s being ripped off, it’s the fact that you didn’t put effort into your writing. It shows a lack of creativity when you steal someone else’s work "word for word." If any of you don’t believe me, go watch the aforementioned AVGN videos. A writer is supposed to have his/her own prose or style making that individuals work recognizable. This care bears review doesn’t convey any originality besides the fact that it pertains to care bears and not TMNT. All you simple did was copy AVGNs reviews and replaced TMNT with Care Bears when necessary. I’m not trying to be a prick, im trying to help acknowledge how you can improve but adapting your OWN style and not steal from others. It’s cool to pay tribute but slipping in a quote here and there, but when you consistently use his intonation in every sentence, its shows how uncreative and lazy the writer is. And yes, I classify this article as plagiarism. For those that are fans of the AVGN, it’s very apparent. Writing is another form of art, and when you slap your name on something that isn’t yours, it’s making false claims of its true creator. I apologize if I got a little preachy, but it really irritates me when people get credit for others peoples work. I should know, cause this crap happened to me a couple years ago you can understand how uptight I am about this. Anyway, just try to be original in the future, that’s all.
    dalmatianlover Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    What sonmanic said is nothing but a flat out lie! I think sonmanic has a weird definition for the word "plagerize". Here is proof that I didn't copy the AVGN's TMNT3 review word for word:

    1. I did not say anything in the Nerd's nasty manner.
    2. There is no mention to the franchise of the past such as action figures, video games and stuff like that.
    3. I did not point out any specific scenes that confused me.
    4. I did not list the Top 10 Worst Quotes from the Movie in here at all.
    5. I didn't talk about debating what the third movie's subtitle would be or what villain(s) would be in it.
    6. I didn't end this article by saying, "Cowabunga...COWA-FUCKING-PIECE-OF-DOG-SHIT!" and showing a clip of me destroying the tape.

    I don't recall putting anything in here that's relavite to any of his Ghostbusters reviews, so I don't know where the hell you got that idea. It sounds to me like you're saying that if anyone talks about something bad and starting a whole thing with saying "I'm a child of the 80's and I loved ___", you think that they're ripping off the AVGN right away. Lots of people were children of the 80's! The Nerd isn't the only one.

    A highly doubt that the AVGN ever gets mad when other people immitate him. He probably just lets them go and just appreciates the fact that he has fans.

    So, what I'm saying is, if you find anything in this article, or any other article that I write, that sounds similar to something the Angry Video Game Nerd has said, I am not ripping him off; I am paying a tribute to him.
    sonmanic Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Im with Spongeroks. This is taken word for word from the AVGN's reveiws from Ghostbuters and TMNT III movie. Its fun to homage to someone, but when you completly plagerize material, I have no respect for that. 0 points on you.
    Rainbow Bright Posted 5 years 6 months ago
    Beastly!!!!
    Spongeroks Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    This sounded like the Angry Video game nerd's review for TMNT3, but thumbs up anyway.
    LivinLegend85 Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    honestly to much info and pictures about a movie almost nobody watched. but you get a 10 for the effort honestly. good job.
    Falcor Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    Wow. *Shakes head* That does sound ify. I don't think I ever even saw the 3rd or 4th movies or knew they existed lol. I loved the first 2 Care Bears movies, though.
    Fangarius Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    Yes, DL, even I have to admit, once a Care Bear fan myself [Even had a fan letter published in the Marvel Comic once.], 'Adventures in Wonderland,' was a major disappointment.

    Even the trailer was greatly misleading because when my cousin and I went to go see it, we were expecting the elements you described from the first movie. Even the Nutcracker Suite was a disappointment since the villain there can dispatch the Care Bears without difficulty, and I was like what-th-hey? These are the CARE BEARS! C'mon they can foil a guy who can freeze hearts, stop some wizard, his niece and sidekick without fail, but they're helpless against a Wonderland baddie?

    It just wasn't what we were expecting, and the way the guy was foiled.. where exactly was the Care Bear Stare? Both movies used it profusely, but here you hardly see them use it, and I agree with the voice acting.

    But in all fairness, I suspect the reason Tenderheart ended up with Wicket's voice (from the Ewoks' TV show) was I think the television show had come out after the second movie, and I suspect the producers didn't want the kids' confused at this point. Who knows?

    Great article, btw!
    melch Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    well it might of been bad but look on the bright side look at all thoughs colors!
    Tv_Themes Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    For some reason, this review reminded me of the Angry Video Game Nerds review on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Three. Watch the review and you will see the similarities.

    I have never seen Care Bears 3 but I must say, I'm glad Good Luck Bear was a major character in it. I can only think of 2 Tv episodes he had main roles in so he got a big shaft in it. He also had a big role in the first movie but not in the second.
    Jake 1079 Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    3 is indeed the point where some great trilogys lose there touch and go down the drain. Keep an eye out for my next article for more on this.
    shiroihikari Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    Unlike most other girls born in the 80s, I was not a Care Bears fan. I mean, I had a Care Bear, but I never liked the cartoons or went crazy over the toys. So I never even saw this movie, and I consider that a good thing. XD
    RyogaXvX Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    God I remember the stupid Cheshire Cat Rap.. Even as a child i thought it was rediculous.
    Forgotten sin Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    eh, it's Canadian Care bears, so i can't truly hate it.
    Luna2 Posted 5 years 7 months ago
    good artice. i aggre with you 100% on the wonderland movie the music wasnt as good the plot wasnt as good as the past movies and rapping in wonder land/care bears dont mix!

    still i think the music was better in this movie then the new series or cgi movies
    Score:
    0
    More from dalmatianlover
    © Retro Junk | Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise