C.C. : Nightmare On Elm Street

Part 1 of a retrospective on one of the most popular horror films of all time.




A Nightmare On Elm Street (1984)

Directed By: Wes Craven

Starring: Heather Langenkamp, John Saxon, Ronee Blakley, Amanda Wyss, Nick Corri, Johnny Depp

and
Robert Englund
as Fred Krueger




The real nightmare on Elm Street is not Krueger, but the poorly-recieved remake.


Y'know, I'm not really a huge fan of horror films. Everyone has a movie genre that they can't stand. For me, it's horror (and westerns, but that's not important.). But whenever the month of Halloween comes into the picture, I strangely get in the mood to watch at least one retro horror film from the 80's or the 90's. Like the time I reviewed Tales From The Darkside: The Movie! Sure, it wasn't that good, but at least I was willing to give the genre a chance.

And this year, I'm doing it again! But not with some obscure horror film or some popular Michael Jackson music video. No, THIS time, I will be looking at an entire horror movie franchise. A set of films with one thing in common.....





This dude. Oh, yeah, you know I'm talking about.


Yep, I will be looking at the Nightmare On Elm Street films, starting from the classic 1984 film that started it all, to the 1994 New Nightmare that...doesn't really take place in the series' universe. But hey! As long as it has the man who looks like he burnt a pizza on his face that we all know and love, it counts.







Now what DOESN'T count are the following. One, I won't review the short-lived television series Freddy's Nightmares, just because there would be too much to cover. Plus, I only want to cover the feature films this year. Maybe next year....

Second, I will not be looking at the 2003 film Freddy Vs. Jason, because it was made in 2003 (duh), and for me, the cutoff date for retro...anything, ends at 2000. Perhaps I'll mention my thoughts on the film in a nutshell later on in the month....




Anyways, let's dive our claws into this movie!




Once upon a time, there was a young director named Wes Craven, who had a dream to sell his idea about a knife-fingered child murderer to the big screen. The problem? No one wanted it. Not even Craven's first choice, Walt Disney friggin' Pictures! Just imagine how THAT would've turned out.

Then, when all things seemed bleak, a little company named New Line Cinema wanted to be just like all the other huge movie companies when it grew up, needed a film that could put them on the map. Craven's idea was that film, and it grew into a money-making franchise spewing with sequels, TV shows, video games, and more!





Looks like someone watched Serendipity, The Pink Dragon.




It helped Craven become one of the icons of horror. As for New Line Cinema....I don't know WHAT happened to them. I think they released some movie called Lord Of the Rings, but I think that's it.

But now that it's 2011, nearing 2012, does this film hold up after so many years? Well, if you haven't been reading reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, you're obviously crazy. But I'm gonna see if this little scare-trip truly takes the title as one of the best horror films of all time.



"Hello? No, I told you I won't be playing a pirate in your Pirates movie! How will THAT help my career?"





Heather Langenkamp disapproves of the situation.




WHAT'S THE FILM ABOUT?

Some strange shenanigans are going on in the peaceful Elm Street - several teenagers are having the exact same dream about child murderer Fred Kruger (Englund), who was burned alive years ago thanks to the parents of Elm Street.

Now every time these teens have the dream again, Kruger pops up and kills them off in disturbing-yet-original ways. The only one taking this seriously is Nancy (Langenkamp), who is driven to madness in trying to get rid of this maniacal monster once and for all.




"Stick em up, bush!"


WHAT'S BAD ABOUT IT?

Two words - the gore. Now, I have no problem with explicit gore (to a point) in a movie. It's just in this movie, a majority of the story is told without tons of blood gushing out like the already popular Friday The 13th series. Whenever a death scene results in tubs of blood (see Johnny Depp's infamous "death bed" scene), the spook factor sorta wears off.



WHAT'S GOOD ABOUT IT?

Everything else.

Heather Langenkamp's performance is really intriguing here. She truly looks like she's being tortured by a force that she can't destroy, and looks so determined to stop this killer, you want her to defeat him. That's something you don't see in horror films then or now...likable protagonists (at least from the ones I've seen).

The film really works as a psychological thriller rather than a horror film. It isn't the type of film where you wanna keep your lights on when you go to sleep. The way the story is told, it feels like all the events in this movie is all one big dream, like an early Inception. Could these events be real, or is Nancy's concern and determination to stop this killer so intense, that she wants off someone who really isn't there and is all part of her imagination?




Planning to sleep tonight? Well, this pic will ruin THAT for ya!



And finally, let's not forget the real star of the film: the terrifying Freddy Kruger. Is there anything to say about this guy? He's crazy, he's surreal (but not too much that destroys the film's much needed realism), and his ways of killing off these kids are creative and certainly gets the job done. If there were a modern movie monster that I would like to kill me off, it would be Freddy. At least he puts thought into killing off his victims. Wouldn't YOU like to be killed by a bed that literally eats you alive and burps out your blood?

Yeah, me neither.




Langenkamp prepares for her Heathers audition.






Ooh, looks like Wile E. Coyote fell down the cliff again.





Uh-oh, she's in the Lord of Darkness's lair from Legend. She's screwed.




Spiderman, Spiderman, does whatever a spider can...





BOTTOM LINE:

A Nightmare On Elm Street has definately lost it's scare factor over the years, but I can say that it works well without them. The story is brilliantly told, the characters are surprisingly likable enough, and while the gore can be off-putting, the death scenes are certainly creative. I can easily say that this one of the best horror films of all time.


OVERALL SCORE:

4.5/5




But despite this film's greatness, I'm certainly not holding up much hope for the sequels. But are they as bad as everyone says they are? Well, stay tuned later on in the month, as we continue with A Nightmare On Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge.


See ya!






Log in to comment on or rate this article. You can even write your own!
Comments
    DonnaPiranha Posted 9 months 9 days ago
    I can't believe how many PeoPle did not see the 1st freddy C. Movies !
    batman4u54 Posted 1 year 7 months ago
    When freddy first came on screen with that brown hat and screeeeehhhhh, that scared me. wes craven. He is cool.
    shotz90s Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    The first time I saw Nightmare was right after it came out on VHS. I talked my parents into letting me watch it when they were going out for an evening and I was allowed to be home by myself (I think I was 11 or 12). Well of course we had a thunderstorm that night and during the most exciting part of the movie my cat decided to start knocking a golf ball around in the basement. He kept banging it against the furnace. Scared the sh** out of me because I didn't know it was him doing it and of course my first thoughts weren't where is the cat but were what is in the furnace. I finally got up enough courage to go downstairs and find out what was going on. I still love this movie because of that.
    mysticwryter Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    From one Freddy fan, great job on the article. New line is known as "the house that Freddy built". T.u.

    retrodave Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    I never saw the original I saw some of the sequals and the remake. But I would love to see the first one. Your right Freddy is awesome and he dose has the most interesting ways of killing people which, I think is what makes the Elm Street francize very entertaing.
    asnaes1981 Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    One of my favorite movie franchises. This and the Die Hard movies.
    TreyVore Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    You and me are kinda alike buddy.

    To be honest I don't have much history with horror films either. I just say if you really want their thrills that they offer you could watch an action movie. They're just better for you.

    Sometimes I do watch them and it's usually on Halloween. I haven't seen this movie yet but just maybe I will. To get a better appreciation for a horror film dual review that I did (it's posted just a little bit before yours) I was taking in gems like "Jaws" and "Fright Night" as well as some trash like "The Stuff" and "TerrorVision".

    I'll give you a thumbs up.

    BTW, did you like Groundskeeper Willie's stint as Freddy on the Simpsons' Treehouse of Horror #6?
    Benjanime Posted 1 year 8 months ago
    funny thing, one of my cousins started watching the tv series, and it's a flat out embarrassment. freddy shows up as a silhouette most of the time, and some of the stories are pretty bitter to say the least. since i've never once seen this movie before i'll check it out online soon. great article as always. thumbs uppeth!
    Score:
    17
    More from Nails105
    © Retro Junk | Contact | Report a Bug | Privacy Policy | Advertise